DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-68168-7_64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Model Discretization Density in FEM Numerical Analysis on the Determined Stress Level in Bone Surrounding Dental Implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, FEA results are sensitive to mesh quality with tendency to overestimation of maximal value of stresses around the dental implant neck because of the presence of the singular point at the margin of bone contacted with the implant [24]. The better manner of estimation of an implant solution is to show the zone of destruction or the zone exposed to atrophy from overloading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, FEA results are sensitive to mesh quality with tendency to overestimation of maximal value of stresses around the dental implant neck because of the presence of the singular point at the margin of bone contacted with the implant [24]. The better manner of estimation of an implant solution is to show the zone of destruction or the zone exposed to atrophy from overloading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to many researchers [36,37], these stress results at singularity points cannot be considered to evaluate the strength of the endodontic file. To get around this issue, Żmudzki [32] proposes to exclude the stress results at these points and then extrapolate the extreme value from the stress values in the remaining nodes. Following this idea, Figure 10b shows a plot of the evolution of the von Mises stress along the observed edge.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Results Of The Stress Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting FE models were analyzed using ABAQUS [31] (Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp, Providence, RI, USA). As suggested by Żmudzki [32,33], the convergence of the mesh can be assessed by means of an error energy norm E. In this error estimator, the stress vector σ σ σ and the averaged stress vector σ * σ * σ * are used to determine a stress error vector ∆σ ∆σ ∆σ:…”
Section: Mesh Convergence Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smaller the element size, the more accurate the analysis results. However, in certain cases, a smaller element size produces a higher calculation value compared to actual value obtained from the experiments [26]. In this situation, a limit must be set on the percentage error of the results obtained from calculations to determine the appropriate element size [27].…”
Section: Mesh Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%