2014
DOI: 10.1167/14.10.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Microsaccades on Contrast Sensitivity: Theoretical Analysis and Experimental Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study that specifically measured contrast thresholds in the presence and absence of microsaccades found no differences between these two conditions neither at low nor high spatial frequencies (Mostofi et al, 2014). …”
Section: Visual Functions Of Microsaccadesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study that specifically measured contrast thresholds in the presence and absence of microsaccades found no differences between these two conditions neither at low nor high spatial frequencies (Mostofi et al, 2014). …”
Section: Visual Functions Of Microsaccadesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( D ) Mean amplification resulting from ocular drift as a function of spatial frequency. Data represent averages across N =5 observers [78]. ( E ) Same as in C after adjusting contrasts to match the structure of natural images.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…( B ) Mean amplification resulting from ocular drift as a function of spatial frequency. Data represent averages across N =5 observers (Mostofi, Boi & Rucci 2014). ( C ) Results of experiments in which subjects judged the orientation of a noisy grating (±45° either at low or high spatial frequency) in the presence (normal) and absence (stabilized) of normal fixational eye movements.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%