2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of duct geometry on the performance of Darrieus hydroturbine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
37
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This prediction accuracy is much higher than previous vertical axis turbine CFD predictions, which exhibit maximum Cp errors of more than 45% [12,14,[29][30][31], possibly due to the inclusion of the full turbine geometry in the present study. The use of 3D models also allows for the direct simulation of Cp without the need for empirical correction for 2D models as previous used [8,10,16].…”
Section: Validation Of Numerical Simulations With Experimental Fluid contrasting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This prediction accuracy is much higher than previous vertical axis turbine CFD predictions, which exhibit maximum Cp errors of more than 45% [12,14,[29][30][31], possibly due to the inclusion of the full turbine geometry in the present study. The use of 3D models also allows for the direct simulation of Cp without the need for empirical correction for 2D models as previous used [8,10,16].…”
Section: Validation Of Numerical Simulations With Experimental Fluid contrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Qualitatively domain wall height effects are shown in Figure 8, where the proximity of the wall to the turbine due to low domain height of 1.25D increased flow velocity through the domain due to flow constriction, artificially increasing Cp. Although not studied here this constriction effect could be harnessed to increase Cp through the use of shaped ducts or walls or limited water depths [12]. …”
Section: Domain Size Independencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These 2D models are often used due to their significantly reduced computational requirements when compared to Three-Dimensional (3D) models. However, these 2D approaches often significantly over predict maximum power output [4][5][6][7] due to the highly 3D nature of turbine hydrodynamic flow due to blade and strut joint and blade tip losses [8]. Numerical simulations are also commonly performed using fully turbulent models [4][5][6][7][8], again due to their computational efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%