2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2004.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of cooking conditions on cooking loss and tenderness of raw and marinated chicken breast meat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
77
2
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
77
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The samples were then removed and cooled at room temperature for 30 min, after which the cooking loss values were calculated based on the difference in the weight of the meat before and after cooking (Barbanti and Pasquini, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were then removed and cooled at room temperature for 30 min, after which the cooking loss values were calculated based on the difference in the weight of the meat before and after cooking (Barbanti and Pasquini, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we found that cooking loss for all treatments slightly increased or decreased from 0 to 3 days of storage, then abruptly decreased at 7 days of storage. In particular, cooking loss is expressed as the reduction in weight of meat during the cooking process, and has three major components: thawing, dripping and evaporation (Barbanti & Pasquini, 2005;Jama et al, 2008). Eventually, an increase in cooking loss has a negative impact on the meat industry because it leads to deterioration of nutritional quality (Jama et al, 2008).…”
Section: Physicochemical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) All values are mean ± SD. 3) Sensory scores were assessed on 10 point scale where 1 = extremely bad or slight, 10 = extremely good or much. …”
Section: Sensory Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%