2014
DOI: 10.1080/21548455.2014.930210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of a Science-Focused After-School Program on Underrepresented High-School Students' Science Attitudes and Trajectory: A survey validation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Known limitations to engaging young people include the reduced or lack of access of certain groups to extra‐curricular activities because of geography, socio‐economics and school type (Puvirajah et al., 2015). Workshop accessibility also has context‐specific requirements and constraints.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Known limitations to engaging young people include the reduced or lack of access of certain groups to extra‐curricular activities because of geography, socio‐economics and school type (Puvirajah et al., 2015). Workshop accessibility also has context‐specific requirements and constraints.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por lo tanto, parece ser que los autores de estos instrumentos se han limitado meramente a crear o adaptar ítems a partir de cuestionarios existentes (en la mayoría de los casos también con una pobre conceptualización teórica de las actitudes) y, a emplear dimensiones actitudinales de forma aleatoria y sin una base teórica coherente. Ello lleva a que se incluya bajo el mismo paraguas constructos tan diversos -y que cuentan con marcos teóricos propios diferenciados-como creencias y valores (Hilman et al, 2016), autoeficacia y motivaciones (Puvirajah et al, 2015) o habilidad percibida, valores y compromiso (Mahoney, 2010). Asimismo, la ausencia de un marco teórico conduce a la inclusión de constructos cuya relevancia en el estudio de las actitudes hacia la ciencia es en el mejor de los casos dudosa.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…For example, Kind et al, (2007) decided to retain a 7-factor structure, despite the scree-test clearly revealing a structure composed of less factors. Puvirajah et al, (2015) retained a 3-factor structure, although scree-test also suggested otherwise. Some test developers retained factors with less than three items (e.g.…”
Section: Other Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, instead of using existing published attitude tests, Tytler-Wood, Knezek and Christensen (2010) developed a Likert-type and semantic differential assessments for the specific evaluation of the impact of the Middle Schoolers Out to Save the World project, with insufficient psychometric evaluation. Puvirajah, Verma & Martin-Hansen (2015) designed a test for the measurement of the impact of a Science-focused after-school program on underrepresented high-school students' attitudes towards science that was also not justified given the many existing attitude tests measuring the same constructs as theirs. Kind, Jones and Barmby (2007) instrument was developed for the evaluation of the Lab in a Lorry initiative and, astonishingly and wrongly, authors used this informal science education program as the rationale behind the included constructs in the test: "All the attitude areas listed, with the exceptions of attitude towards school, were chosen as areas that could possibly be affected by an initiative such as Lab in a Lorry."…”
Section: Impacts Of Purpose On Rigormentioning
confidence: 99%