2018
DOI: 10.1001/amajethics.2018.1152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infertility, Inequality, and How Lack of Insurance Coverage Compromises Reproductive Autonomy

Abstract: Disparities in access to infertility care and insurance coverage of infertility treatment represent marked injustices in US health care. The World Health Organization defines infertility as a disease. Infertility has multiple associated billing codes in use, as determined by the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. However, the often-prohibitive costs associated with infertility treatment, coupled with the lack of universal insurance coverage mandates, contribute to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The postcode lottery of fertility treatment in the UK means that in many boroughs access is limited by stringent criteria, and the number of IVF cycles funded maybe none or up to three. In the USA there are only 16 states with a mandate for insurers to offer funding for fertility treatment (including California, but IVF is not covered as standard) with patients accessing treatment in the other states having to finance their care privately ('Infertility, Inequality, and How Lack of Insurance Coverage Compromises Reproductive Autonomy', Insogna & Ginsburg, 2018). Ireland remains one of only two European Union countries not to offer national funding for assisted conception, but by contrast, both Finland and Israel have very generous state funding for fertility treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The postcode lottery of fertility treatment in the UK means that in many boroughs access is limited by stringent criteria, and the number of IVF cycles funded maybe none or up to three. In the USA there are only 16 states with a mandate for insurers to offer funding for fertility treatment (including California, but IVF is not covered as standard) with patients accessing treatment in the other states having to finance their care privately ('Infertility, Inequality, and How Lack of Insurance Coverage Compromises Reproductive Autonomy', Insogna & Ginsburg, 2018). Ireland remains one of only two European Union countries not to offer national funding for assisted conception, but by contrast, both Finland and Israel have very generous state funding for fertility treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to MedlinePlus (n.d.), infertility is the inability to become pregnant after 12 months of trying to conceive and includes miscarriages and stillbirths. Despite the WHO and the AMA classifying infertility as a disease, there is no federally mandated insurance coverage for infertility treatment (Insogna & Ginsburg, 2018;Strauss, 2018).…”
Section: Healthcare Policy: Federally Mandated Insurance Coverage For Infertility Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of those 19 states, 13 have comprehensive coverage for costs associated with IVF, and 10 have fertility preservation laws (RESOLVE, 2020) (see Table 1). However, coverage may not exist for other ART treatments and associated medications (Insogna & Ginsburg, 2018).…”
Section: Disproportionate Impacts On Marginalized Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 The limited financial insurance for ART treatments, although the associated high costs, implies that infertility is viewed as a condition underserving of financial assistance in LMICs. 23 Consequently, the high cost of care borne by individuals is reported among the key barriers to accessing assisted reproduction services. 24 In LMICs infertility services are generally accessed by the well-off, at mainly private health facilities.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%