2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.05.07.490748
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring selection effects in SARS-CoV-2 with Bayesian Viral Allele Selection

Abstract: The global effort to sequence millions of SARS-CoV-2 genomes has provided an unprecedented view of viral evolution. Characterizing how selection acts on SARS-CoV-2 is critical to developing effective, long-lasting vaccines and other treatments, but the scale and complexity of genomic surveillance data make rigorous analysis distinctly challenging. To meet this challenge, we develop Bayesian Viral Allele Selection (BVAS), a principled and scalable probabilistic method for inferring the genetic determinants of d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, because estimates are consistent in showing a 30%-40% growth advantage per viral generation of BA.2 over BA.1 (23,24), and BA.1 appears to derive much of its fitness advantage from antibody escape (23), these modest differences in neutralization titers may be epidemiologically significant. As the emergence of new variants continues -with BA.1 replaced by BA.2, which has been since been replaced by its sublineages BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/5 -it is important to characterize the cross-neutralization properties of these variants in unvaccinated, vaccinated, and hybrid immune populations, particularly as the current phase of the pandemic appears to be driven by antibody escape (21,23,27,28). Among vaccinated persons, "breakthrough" infections are not unexpected; the primary goal of vaccination has been protection against severe disease rather than blocking transmission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, because estimates are consistent in showing a 30%-40% growth advantage per viral generation of BA.2 over BA.1 (23,24), and BA.1 appears to derive much of its fitness advantage from antibody escape (23), these modest differences in neutralization titers may be epidemiologically significant. As the emergence of new variants continues -with BA.1 replaced by BA.2, which has been since been replaced by its sublineages BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/5 -it is important to characterize the cross-neutralization properties of these variants in unvaccinated, vaccinated, and hybrid immune populations, particularly as the current phase of the pandemic appears to be driven by antibody escape (21,23,27,28). Among vaccinated persons, "breakthrough" infections are not unexpected; the primary goal of vaccination has been protection against severe disease rather than blocking transmission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a challenge of existing phylogenetic and phylodynamic approaches, such as those using birth-death and coalescent models, is that they usually assume that genetic diversity is phenotypically neutral and are therefore not well suited to forecast resistance or antigenic evolution. There are modelling approaches that account for different growth or death rates in different lineages, including multi-strain epidemiological models, genome-scale negative frequency-dependent selection models 76,77 , multi-type birth-death models 41 , the binary-state speciation and extinction framework 87 and its extensions, and estimates of selection coefficients or fitness using genomic data 17,88 . These may group sequences into types or variants and proceed with an assumption of phenotypic neutrality within these types or focus on identifying mutations that confer an advantage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%