2018
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syy015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring Phylogenetic Networks Using PhyloNet

Abstract: PhyloNet was released in 2008 as a software package for representing and analyzing phylogenetic networks. At the time of its release, the main functionalities in PhyloNet consisted of measures for comparing network topologies and a single heuristic for reconciling gene trees with a species tree. Since then, PhyloNet has grown significantly. The software package now includes a wide array of methods for inferring phylogenetic networks from data sets of unlinked loci while accounting for both reticulation (e.g., … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
197
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
197
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Δ test was significant using multiple different subsamples of four taxa, suggesting multiple ancestral introgression events. An initial attempt to disentangle these events using Phylonet v3.8.0 [97,98] with the seven Papionini species and an outgroup was unsuccessful, as Phylonet failed to converge on an optimal network for these taxa. When there are multiple episodes of gene flow within a clade, even complex computational machinery may be unable to infer the correct combination of events.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Δ test was significant using multiple different subsamples of four taxa, suggesting multiple ancestral introgression events. An initial attempt to disentangle these events using Phylonet v3.8.0 [97,98] with the seven Papionini species and an outgroup was unsuccessful, as Phylonet failed to converge on an optimal network for these taxa. When there are multiple episodes of gene flow within a clade, even complex computational machinery may be unable to infer the correct combination of events.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We utilized neighbor‐net (Bryant & Moulton, ) to visualize overall patterns of molecular genetic diversity. Likelihood‐based methods (Solís‐Lemus & Ané, ; Solís‐Lemus et al ., ; Wen et al ., ; Zhang et al ., ) that we have utilized on smaller oak datasets (Eaton et al ., ; Hauser et al ., ; McVay et al ., ,b; Crowl et al ., ) proved computationally intractable for the current dataset. Consequently, we utilized a splits network inferred with SplitsTree v.14.3 (Huson & Bryant, ) based on the maximum‐likelihood (GTR+γ) pairwise distance matrix estimated in RAxML and the same datasets utilized for the singletons tree.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also computed RF tree distance, because it is widely applied in the evaluation of species phylogenies 75 . We used PhyloNET software 76 to count the number of partitions that were common and different between the true and the inferred phylogeny. The RF distance is the number of differing partitions divided by the total number of partitions in the two phylogenies.…”
Section: Multi-labeled Tree Edit Distance (Mlted)mentioning
confidence: 99%