2006
DOI: 10.1198/106186006x133069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inference in Curved Exponential Family Models for Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
495
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 448 publications
(498 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
495
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although fitting exponential random graphs using this pseudolikelihood estimation is computationally relatively easy, the properties of the estimator are not well understood and the estimated θ are known to be inaccurate in many cases (Robins et al, 2007a). An alternative and more straightforward method to fit exponential random graph models is by means of Monte Carlo maximum likelihood estimation (Hunter and Handcock, 2006). This form of estimation simulates a distribution of random networks from a starting set of model parameters, θ 0 , and subsequently refines the parameter values by comparing the distribution of networks against the measured network x obs .…”
Section: Bayesian Exponential Random Graph Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although fitting exponential random graphs using this pseudolikelihood estimation is computationally relatively easy, the properties of the estimator are not well understood and the estimated θ are known to be inaccurate in many cases (Robins et al, 2007a). An alternative and more straightforward method to fit exponential random graph models is by means of Monte Carlo maximum likelihood estimation (Hunter and Handcock, 2006). This form of estimation simulates a distribution of random networks from a starting set of model parameters, θ 0 , and subsequently refines the parameter values by comparing the distribution of networks against the measured network x obs .…”
Section: Bayesian Exponential Random Graph Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) and (4) dampens the effect of large changes in the statistics of higher k and was in this study fixed to 0.75 so that the model remains a regular exponential random graph model (Hunter and Handcock, 2006).…”
Section: Local Structure Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Markov chain Monte Carlo maximum likelihood estimation (MCMC-MLE) is the preferred method for estimating cross-sectional (single network at a single time period) ERGMs (Geyer and Thompson 1992;Hunter and Handcock 2006;Snijders 2002;Snijders et al 2006;van Duijn, Gile, and Handcock 2009). An alternative method of estimation is called maximum pseudolikelihood estimation (MPLE) (Hyvarinen 2006;Strauss and Ikeda 1990).…”
Section: Exponential Random Graph Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See the "Remark" in Section 3 of that paper to see why it is used rather than the version given in Snijders, Pattison, Robins, and Handcock (2006). The optional argument fixed indicates whether the scale parameter lambda is to be fit as a curved exponential-family model (see Hunter and Handcock 2006). The default is FALSE, which means the scale parameter is not fixed and thus the model is a CEF model.…”
Section: Parametric Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New specifications for non-degenerate models of triad-based clustering have been developed (Snijders et al 2006;Hunter and Handcock 2006) and used with some success Goodreau, Kitts, and Morris 2008b). These are dyad-based configurations, rather than node-based, and count the number of times that both nodes have a tie to a third node.…”
Section: Shared Partner Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%