2019
DOI: 10.1101/679142
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inference based decisions in a hidden state foraging task: differential contributions of prefrontal cortical areas

Abstract: Essential features of the world are often hidden and must be inferred by constructing internal models based on indirect evidence. Here, to study the mechanisms of inference we established a foraging task that is naturalistic and easily learned, yet can distinguish inference from simpler strategies such as the direct integration of sensory data. We show that both mice and humans learn a strategy consistent with optimal inference of a hidden state. However, humans acquire this strategy more than an order of magn… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reward delivery at a given site was probabilistic (given by P REW ) and switched stochastically to 0 after a variable number of licks, controlled by the probability of site depletion (P DPL ; STAR Methods). 25 Mice were trained to remain still while licking at a given site and to run a set distance on a treadmill to switch between sites (Figure 1B). Consistent with previous reports, 1,26,27 we observed a tight relationship between PS and locomotor states (Figure 1C; across sessions, cross-correlation maximum r = 0.44 ± 0.13, p < 10 À7 ; Figures S1A and S1B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reward delivery at a given site was probabilistic (given by P REW ) and switched stochastically to 0 after a variable number of licks, controlled by the probability of site depletion (P DPL ; STAR Methods). 25 Mice were trained to remain still while licking at a given site and to run a set distance on a treadmill to switch between sites (Figure 1B). Consistent with previous reports, 1,26,27 we observed a tight relationship between PS and locomotor states (Figure 1C; across sessions, cross-correlation maximum r = 0.44 ± 0.13, p < 10 À7 ; Figures S1A and S1B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8]34 In the foraging task, different levels of uncertainty can be achieved by varying the statistics of the environment (i.e., P REW and P DPL ). 25 In the easy protocol, where P REW and P DPL are high, site depletion most often happens early in the bout, and a few unrewarded licks are strong evidence in favor of site depletion. Hence, there is little uncertainty about whether the site is depleted.…”
Section: The Effects Of Drn 5-ht Photostimulation Depend On the Level Of Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another strategy is to infer task state change after encountering only a small subset of stimuli with choice outcomes, and update category boundary estimate to guide future behaviors. Such inferencebased strategy can be supported by model-based reinforcement learning 1,11,19 , allowing more rapid switch of choice behavior upon environmental changes without re-learning associations for each stimulus. To test these possibilities in our task, we examined how mice changed their choices upon reversing stimuli following block transition.…”
Section: Flexible Auditory Categorization In Mice Exhibits Characterimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies began to elucidate the functions of specific projections from OFC to certain cortical and subcortical regions [8][9][10] . However, the sensory discrimination learning 8 or the conventional reversal learning based on the go/no-go task 9 provides only a single prolonged learning curve, does not manifest model-based algorithm, and cannot distinguish rapid behavioral adaptation via model-based inference 2,3,11 from slow model-free reinforcement learning 1,12 . Therefore, it remains an open question how the structured knowledge is represented in the brain, and what type of circuit architecture and operation mechanism is responsible for using and updating of the internal models during flexible decision-making.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%