2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inertial sensor based reference gait data for healthy subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(38 reference statements)
4
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean coefficient of variation values of PINP and CTX analyses were 3.7% and 1.7%, respectively. Evaluation of functional recovery included the measurements of walking speed using a validated gait analysis system (RehaWatch, Hasomed GmbH, Germany) . Subjects were asked to walk at a self‐selected comfortable walking speed along a 10‐m walkway, and the mean coefficient of variation of the repeated measurements was 4.7%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean coefficient of variation values of PINP and CTX analyses were 3.7% and 1.7%, respectively. Evaluation of functional recovery included the measurements of walking speed using a validated gait analysis system (RehaWatch, Hasomed GmbH, Germany) . Subjects were asked to walk at a self‐selected comfortable walking speed along a 10‐m walkway, and the mean coefficient of variation of the repeated measurements was 4.7%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of functional recovery included the measurements of walking speed (48) using a validated gait analysis system (RehaWatch, Hasomed GmbH, Germany). (49) Subjects were asked to walk at a self-selected comfortable walking speed (48) along a 10-m walkway, and the mean coefficient of variation of the repeated measurements was 4.7%. Assessment of interindividual differences in daily walking activity was performed by means of digital pedometers (50) for 7 days.…”
Section: Exploratory and Safety Endpointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive description of both systems, including the information regarding reliability, validity, reference data and their value to measure falls risk, is available elsewhere. 17,18,[21][22][23][24][25] Data collection for each subject took approximately 20 minutes. During a follow-up period of 12 months, all falls were recorded by the caregivers at the nursing home in a standardized falls protocol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters were obtained through analysis of trunk accelerations, a technique considered robust and that exploits the fact that foot contacts with the ground cause distinct, rapid, and easily identifiable oscillations of the accelerometric signal (Kavanagh and Menz, 2008). Of note is that trunk accelerations have been demonstrated to be reliable in characterizing childrens' gait patterns (Brandes et al, 2006;Schwesig et al, 2011). Children were instructed to walk along an 8-m pathway (corresponding to $6-10 steps depending on a child's step length), at a self-selected speed and in the most natural manner possible.…”
Section: Gradementioning
confidence: 99%