Inequalities in living well with dementia—The impact of deprivation on well‐being, quality of life and life satisfaction: Results from the improving the experience of dementia and enhancing active life study

Abstract

Objectives Area level factors, such as deprivation and urban/rural settings, have been associated with variation in local resources and services and health inequality in later life. The aim of this study is to investigate the potential impact of deprivation and urban/rural areas on capability to live well with dementia and to examine whether availability of informal carers modified the associations. Methods The analysis was based on a large cohort study of 1547 community‐dwelling people with dementia across Great Britain. Quality of life, life satisfaction, and well‐being were measured as indices of “living well.” Multivariate modelling was used to investigate differences in living well measures across deprivation quintiles and urban/rural areas adjusting for sociodemographic factors and number of comorbidities and stratifying by three groups: those living with a carer, those with a noncoresident carer and those without a carer. Results Negative dose‐response relationships between deprivation and measures of quality of life (−2.12; 95% CI: −3.52, −0.73), life satisfaction (−1.27; 95% CI: −2.70, 0.16), and well‐being (−5.24; 95% CI: −10.11, −0.36) were found in participants living with a carer. The associations were less clear in those with a noncoresident carer and those without a carer but these two groups generally reported lower scores on living well indicators than participants living with a carer. There was no urban/rural difference. Conclusions The findings suggest inequalities in living well with dementia according to levels of deprivation. Additional resources are needed to improve postdiagnostic care in highly deprived areas and support those who have no informal carer.

A Comprehensive Model of Factors Associated With Capability to “Live Well” for Family Caregivers of People Living With Mild-to-Moderate Dementia

“…In total 1547 people with dementia agreed to participate. Approximately 67% lived in urban and 33% in rural areas 32. When a person with dementia joined the study, where available a caregiver was invited to take part as well.…”

Epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: rising global burden and forecasted trends

“…Hence, the financial implication of the condition-arising from both the direct medical and social care costs as well as the cost of informal care-is equivalent to 1.1% of the global gross domestic product (GDP) 4 . Those affected by dementia and their informal caregivers also face difficulties and suffer poor health outcomes that are persistent 5,6 . People living with dementia and their informal caregivers are more likely to be diagnosed with comorbidities and subsequently experience poorer access to health and social care services when compared to their unaffected counterparts 7,8 .…”

Use of routine and cohort data globally in exploring dementia care pathways and inequalities: A systematic review

“…Existing socio‐economic inequalities will exacerbate many current unmet needs in those affected by dementia, with post‐diagnostic care often being underfunded and understaffed 8 . People who are unable to afford their own care will endure worse outcomes relative to more affluent PwD 4,9 . In a time of restricted finances, both individually and in the public provision and staffing for dementia care, it is imperative we better understand inequalities within dementia care pathways.…”