2018
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004945.pub4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term

Abstract: Analysis 1.6. Comparison 1 Labour induction versus expectant management (all trials), Outcome 6 Neonatal convulsions........ Analysis 1.7. Comparison 1 Labour induction versus expectant management (all trials), Outcome 7 Use of anticonvulsants....... Analysis 1.8. Comparison 1 Labour induction versus expectant management (all trials), Outcome 8 Meconium aspiration syndrome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
194
4
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(240 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
15
194
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative birthweight and gestational age formulations also resolve the paradox of intersecting mortality curves . The mechanism by which these formulations eliminate the paradox may be explained using the fetuses‐at‐risk birth rate and the first derivative of the birth rate…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relative birthweight and gestational age formulations also resolve the paradox of intersecting mortality curves . The mechanism by which these formulations eliminate the paradox may be explained using the fetuses‐at‐risk birth rate and the first derivative of the birth rate…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,18 Non-causal models, which serve an important diagnostic or (non- Relative birthweight and gestational age formulations also resolve the paradox of intersecting mortality curves. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]31 The mechanism by which these formulations eliminate the paradox may be explained using the fetuses-at-risk birth rate and the first derivative of the birth rate. 32 Collider stratification bias, [33][34][35] another explanation for the paradox, posits that perinatal mortality curves that intersect across any determinant contrast (eg twins vs singletons) are a consequence of stratification on a variable (eg gestational age) that is the common effect of the determinant in question and an unmeasured or unknown confounder (of the gestational age and perinatal death relation).…”
Section: Explanations For the Paradox In Contemporary Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Evidence from randomised trials shows that early delivery reduces perinatal mortality among low-risk pregnancies at full-term and post-term gestation. 6,7 In highrisk pregnancies and emergency situations at earlier gestation (eg, pre-eclampsia with growth restriction and reversed end-diastolic umbilical artery flow, or placental abruption with fetal bradycardia), the risk-benefit equation could again favour early delivery. 5 In any case, the simplistic assumption that risks quantified in a descriptive model of perinatal mortality would remain unchanged despite intervention is a false premise.…”
Section: Fe Tus E S-at-ris K Pat Tern S Of Perinatal Mortalit Y Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, we excluded two otherwise eligible studies, one of them including only women with favorable 22 and one including only women with unfavorable 23 cervix score, as both of them would be at theoretical risk of selection bias. Our focus on singleton uncomplicated pregnancies at 39 weeks differentiates our meta-analysis from previous systematic reviews [34][35][36][37] , which analyzed term pregnancies (i.e. ≥ 37 weeks' gestation) as a group [34][35][36][37] , included all indications for induction in their main analyses [34][35][36][37] or assessed only the impact of induction on the rate of Cesarean section 34 .…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%