2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0273-1177(99)01066-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells and yeast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, although X-rays are considered low-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation [2], a higher relative biological effectiveness (RBE) at very low-energy (≤30 keV) than at high energy has been reported in the literature. Indeed, very low energy X-rays may lead to higher risk estimates at low doses for many biological endpoints such as double-strand breaks (DSBs), chromosome aberrations, micronucleus formation, and cell survival [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. This could be explained by the fact that energy depositions vary between these different photon energies since the type of interaction (photoelectric effect, Compton effect, or pair production), which causes the energy deposition depends on the photon energy [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, although X-rays are considered low-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation [2], a higher relative biological effectiveness (RBE) at very low-energy (≤30 keV) than at high energy has been reported in the literature. Indeed, very low energy X-rays may lead to higher risk estimates at low doses for many biological endpoints such as double-strand breaks (DSBs), chromosome aberrations, micronucleus formation, and cell survival [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. This could be explained by the fact that energy depositions vary between these different photon energies since the type of interaction (photoelectric effect, Compton effect, or pair production), which causes the energy deposition depends on the photon energy [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem has received great attention from many researchers in the radiation biology and radiation physics areas. Three main approaches have been used to investigate the enhanced effectiveness of low-energy photons compared to γ -rays: in vitro radiobiological studies (see the review in Prise et al (1998), Frankenberg et al (2000)), epidemiological studies (see the review in Hunter and Muirhead (2009)) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of the radiation-DNA interaction , Pomplun 1991, Friedland et al 1998, 1999. Many biological studies related to the RBE of mammography beams have been published during the last decade (Frankenberg et al 2002, Kühne et al 2005, Lehnert et al 2008, Mestres et al 2009, Schmid et al 2002.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RBE is usually defined as the ratio of the dose of a low LET reference radiation to the dose of another radiation needed to achieve the same biological effect. Because the induction of DNA damage is proportional to the absorbed dose D, up to at least a few hundred Gy of low and high LET radiation [37][38][39], RBE can also be defined as the ratio of the damaged yields of cells irradiated with different radiation sources, as shown below:…”
Section: E Relative Biological Effectiveness (Rbe)mentioning
confidence: 99%