1990
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Induction by different thioredoxins of ATPase activity in coupling factor 1 from spinach chloroplasts
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
16
3
1
0
Citation Types
1
8
0
0
Year Published
Range
1992
19922008
2008Publication Types
Select...
15
3
Relationship
0
18
Authors
Journals
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
References 35 publications
1
8
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…six times that with Trx-m [16]. This difference was not observed for soluble CF " (Figure 3) and is in agreement with an earlier report that E. coli Trx and Trx-m have the same efficiency [28]. The difference in second-order rate constants observed for Trx-m and Trx-f activation of CF o CF " is probably due to the fact that Schwarz et al [16] were comparing Trx effects on the membrane-embedded enzyme in the presence of a proton gradient.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, no differences were found in this experiment [27]. Furthermore, little is known of the difference between Trx-f and Trxm for the activation of CF " [19,28]. Comparing the effects of recombinant chloroplast Trx-f and Trx-m on the acceleration kinetics of membrane-bound Cf o CF " , Schwarz et al [16] found that Trx-f was a better reductant for this complex.…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 68%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…six times that with Trx-m [16]. This difference was not observed for soluble CF " (Figure 3) and is in agreement with an earlier report that E. coli Trx and Trx-m have the same efficiency [28]. The difference in second-order rate constants observed for Trx-m and Trx-f activation of CF o CF " is probably due to the fact that Schwarz et al [16] were comparing Trx effects on the membrane-embedded enzyme in the presence of a proton gradient.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, no differences were found in this experiment [27]. Furthermore, little is known of the difference between Trx-f and Trxm for the activation of CF " [19,28]. Comparing the effects of recombinant chloroplast Trx-f and Trx-m on the acceleration kinetics of membrane-bound Cf o CF " , Schwarz et al [16] found that Trx-f was a better reductant for this complex.…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 68%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This cystine disulfide is the target of thioredoxin in the physiological reduction pathway (65)(66)(67)(68). Although there was an initial suggestion of no differential selectivity between thioredoxin f and thioredoxin m in γ subunit reduction (69), later work showed clear specificity for thioredoxin f (70). The redox titration depicted in Figure 5 is the first reported for γ subunit reduction.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Surprisingly, it reports for the first time kinetic data about the interaction between Trx and the isolated CF 1 (with or without its ⑀ subunit). Previous data included qualitative studies of the interaction between CF 1 and different Trxs (22,23), quantitative studies of this interaction at equilibrium using fluorescent probes (23), and kinetic studies of this interaction in thylakoids (21). These different approaches are complementary.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…six times that with Trx-m [16]. This difference was not observed for soluble CF " (Figure 3) and is in agreement with an earlier report that E. coli Trx and Trx-m have the same efficiency [28]. The difference in second-order rate constants observed for Trx-m and Trx-f activation of CF o CF " is probably due to the fact that Schwarz et al [16] were comparing Trx effects on the membrane-embedded enzyme in the presence of a proton gradient.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, no differences were found in this experiment [27]. Furthermore, little is known of the difference between Trx-f and Trxm for the activation of CF " [19,28]. Comparing the effects of recombinant chloroplast Trx-f and Trx-m on the acceleration kinetics of membrane-bound Cf o CF " , Schwarz et al [16] found that Trx-f was a better reductant for this complex.…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 68%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This cystine disulfide is the target of thioredoxin in the physiological reduction pathway (65)(66)(67)(68). Although there was an initial suggestion of no differential selectivity between thioredoxin f and thioredoxin m in γ subunit reduction (69), later work showed clear specificity for thioredoxin f (70). The redox titration depicted in Figure 5 is the first reported for γ subunit reduction.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Surprisingly, it reports for the first time kinetic data about the interaction between Trx and the isolated CF 1 (with or without its ⑀ subunit). Previous data included qualitative studies of the interaction between CF 1 and different Trxs (22,23), quantitative studies of this interaction at equilibrium using fluorescent probes (23), and kinetic studies of this interaction in thylakoids (21). These different approaches are complementary.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…six times that with Trx-m [16]. This difference was not observed for soluble CF " (Figure 3) and is in agreement with an earlier report that E. coli Trx and Trx-m have the same efficiency [28]. The difference in second-order rate constants observed for Trx-m and Trx-f activation of CF o CF " is probably due to the fact that Schwarz et al [16] were comparing Trx effects on the membrane-embedded enzyme in the presence of a proton gradient.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, no differences were found in this experiment [27]. Furthermore, little is known of the difference between Trx-f and Trxm for the activation of CF " [19,28]. Comparing the effects of recombinant chloroplast Trx-f and Trx-m on the acceleration kinetics of membrane-bound Cf o CF " , Schwarz et al [16] found that Trx-f was a better reductant for this complex.…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 68%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This cystine disulfide is the target of thioredoxin in the physiological reduction pathway (65)(66)(67)(68). Although there was an initial suggestion of no differential selectivity between thioredoxin f and thioredoxin m in γ subunit reduction (69), later work showed clear specificity for thioredoxin f (70). The redox titration depicted in Figure 5 is the first reported for γ subunit reduction.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Surprisingly, it reports for the first time kinetic data about the interaction between Trx and the isolated CF 1 (with or without its ⑀ subunit). Previous data included qualitative studies of the interaction between CF 1 and different Trxs (22,23), quantitative studies of this interaction at equilibrium using fluorescent probes (23), and kinetic studies of this interaction in thylakoids (21). These different approaches are complementary.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%