1938
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1938.00850220076005
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Induced Size Effect

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
120
1
0
0

Citation Types

0
4
0
0

Year Published

Range
1916
1916
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
106
8
6
1

Relationship

0
121

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 121 publications

(4 citation statements)
references

References 7 publications

0
4
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The minimization of binocular stimuli does not seem to have prevented this rescaling from occurring; therefore, it is possible that disparity cues from a single location in the visual field can be used to apply a field-wide rescaling of monocular spatial localizations. 36,38 The mean precision and accuracy of individual participants did not covary across locations and were also independent from each other at the group level (i.e., a participant with any level of precision could have any level of accuracy), thus suggesting two independent physiological mechanisms may have contributed to each measure. The presence of bias may not be a concern during clinical testing because a participant's dichoptic localization would be measured in their "natural state," in which any sensory adaptation would presumably be present before, during, and after clinical examination.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 97%