2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/1941629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Dental and Nondental Tissue Regeneration: A Review of an Unexploited Potential

Abstract: Cell-based therapies currently represent the state of art for tissue regenerative treatment approaches for various diseases and disorders. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), reprogrammed from adult somatic cells, using vectors carrying definite transcription factors, have manifested a breakthrough in regenerative medicine, relying on their pluripotent nature and ease of generation in large amounts from various dental and nondental tissues. In addition to their potential applications in regenerative medici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 160 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…iPSCs are derived from patient's somatic cells preventing immune rejection and can differentiate into several different cell lineages. Thanks to the abovementioned advantages, iPSC technology may be implemented as an alternative to autologous grafting, by which the patient-specific somatic cells are reprogramed into MSCs/osteoprogenitor cells, and seeded on an appropriate scaffold, and treated with bioactive molecules [50]. It is assumed that, in the case of dental tissue regeneration, the generation of iPSCs from dental tissue may be more beneficial than other tissue sources because of probable epigenetic memory maintenance of the source tissue [9,51].…”
Section: Osteogenic Potential Of Ipscs In Dental Tissue Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…iPSCs are derived from patient's somatic cells preventing immune rejection and can differentiate into several different cell lineages. Thanks to the abovementioned advantages, iPSC technology may be implemented as an alternative to autologous grafting, by which the patient-specific somatic cells are reprogramed into MSCs/osteoprogenitor cells, and seeded on an appropriate scaffold, and treated with bioactive molecules [50]. It is assumed that, in the case of dental tissue regeneration, the generation of iPSCs from dental tissue may be more beneficial than other tissue sources because of probable epigenetic memory maintenance of the source tissue [9,51].…”
Section: Osteogenic Potential Of Ipscs In Dental Tissue Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To decrease risk of genetic instability and tumour formation of iPSCs, transfection using non-viral vectors (plasmid, proteins and mRNA among others) [ 87 ] and inducing their differentiation into one of their downstream lineages such as MSCs before clinical use were proposed [ 88 ]. iPSCs have been derived from different types of human dental MSCs including PDL cells which showed superior osteogenic capacities in animal models compared to iPSCs from gingival cells [ 87 ]. Mouse iPSCs loaded on silk scaffolds with EMD have successfully induced regeneration of periodontal tissues (more alveolar bone and cementum with PDL fibres in-between compared to scaffolds + EMD controls) in animal models [ 89 ].…”
Section: Tissue Engineering and Periodontal Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSC secretome might represent a clinical alternative to treat patients instantly, while overcoming the limitations and risks associated with cell-based therapy [ 130 , 131 ]. Although MSC conditioned medium (CM) and extracellular vesicles have demonstrated regenerative potential in treating diseases and injuries of the nervous system, heart, lung, liver, periodontium, and soft and hard tissues [ 18 , 132 140 ], several issues must be addressed before its successful clinical application, including the elimination of any xenogenic constitutions and the determination of the exact dosage, frequency of administration, protein composition, and mechanism of action [ 18 , 131 , 141 ].…”
Section: Cell Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%