2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.077
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individualized Risk Model for Venous Thromboembolism After Total Joint Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
102
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
102
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, there is not yet a widely adopted risk stratification system that has been shown to effectively guide thromboprophylaxis strategies after arthroplasty. However, efforts to develop and test such risk stratification tools are underway[27]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there is not yet a widely adopted risk stratification system that has been shown to effectively guide thromboprophylaxis strategies after arthroplasty. However, efforts to develop and test such risk stratification tools are underway[27]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining five articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. [20][21][22][23][24] Table 1 summarizes characteristics of studies included in the review. Identified studies were published between 2012 and 2017.…”
Section: Study Identification and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20,22] Three studies reported use of post-operative pharmacological VTE thromboprophylaxis in patients which comprised a variety of agents including low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), warfarin, aspirin, and direct thrombin or factor Xa inhibitors (e.g., dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, etc). [20,23,24] Two studies reported having no records of the type of VTE prophylaxis received; [21,22] however, one of these studies validated the risk score externally in a different population of patients who received warfarin [22] ( Table 2). Quality assessment using the PROBAST tool showed evidence of high overall risk of bias throughout the included studies.…”
Section: Study Characteristics and Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations