2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/vrw52623.2021.00037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Differences & Task Attention in Cybersickness: A Call for a Standardized Approach to Data Sharing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Varmaghani et al (2021) speculated about the reduction of spatial ability and attention and those factors' impact on cybersickness, but found no significant correlations between cognitive performance and cybersickness. Based on these mixed results, the authors recommend that task workload be measured by default in future cybersickness studies, as recommended Gilbert et al (2021).…”
Section: Tasks Workload and Cybersicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varmaghani et al (2021) speculated about the reduction of spatial ability and attention and those factors' impact on cybersickness, but found no significant correlations between cognitive performance and cybersickness. Based on these mixed results, the authors recommend that task workload be measured by default in future cybersickness studies, as recommended Gilbert et al (2021).…”
Section: Tasks Workload and Cybersicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, These assumptions depend on the duration of the trials and are also associated with an individual's previous VR or VR game experience and other individual differences (such as rate of sensory re-weighting, rate of adaptation during VR exposure, speed of recovery after VR exposure). These individual differences are difficult to measure and require a solid standardized protocol for measurements (Gilbert et al 2021). In conclusion, the review results on contributing factors indicate that it is difficult to predict individual susceptibility given the factors discussed above.…”
Section: Other Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As mentioned above, the causes of cybersickness can be categorized into four main categories of factors that affect cybersickness: hardware, individual differences, task, and software (Gilbert et al, 2021). Pendulum Chair is an environment that can support most studies of these factors.…”
Section: Pendulum Chair Research Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of studies have tried to overcome the issue of cybersickness by exploring the mechanisms of cybersickness (e.g., Reason & Brand, 1975; Riccio & Stoffregen, 1991; Treisman, 1977). Also, it is known that multiple factors influence cybersickness for a person (Gilbert et al, 2021) including the software (e.g., Kim et al, 2020; Kirollos et al, 2022), the hardware (e.g., Caserman et al, 2021; Pouke et al, 2018), the person’s individual characteristics (e.g., Jasper et al, 2021; Lackner, 2014), and the task itself (Sepich et al, 2022). Each of the aforementioned factors can be explored more deeply, but it would be helpful for the research community to have a common research platform that can be customized to conduct research on each factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%