2020
DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v30i5.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indications and Outcome of Patients who had Re-Laparotomy: Two Years’ Experience from a Teaching Hospital in a Developing Nation

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Complications from abdominal surgery may necessitate a second or more surgeries, re-laparotomy. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Data on relaparotomy from the developing nations is limited. This study aims to assess the indications and outcome of patients who had relaparotomyMETHODS: A retrospective review of medical records of all patients who underwent Re-laparotomy at St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College from January 2016 to December 2017 was done.RESULT: Of 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(108 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[13,14] Surgical re-exploration is a surrogate for severity of disease; the more surgically compromised patient is generally more likely to receive a re-exploration and may have a poorer outcome. [15,16] Surprisingly, and unlike international data where nutritional status has been shown to influence paediatric liver transplant recipient outcomes, [17][18][19][20] our cohort did not demonstrate a statistically significant association between risk of mortality and nutritional status, perhaps because of the decreasing trend towards transplanting moderately and severely malnourished recipients (z-scores <-2). Despite the internationally comparable graft and patient survival rates, our surgical complication rate remains ~60%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…[13,14] Surgical re-exploration is a surrogate for severity of disease; the more surgically compromised patient is generally more likely to receive a re-exploration and may have a poorer outcome. [15,16] Surprisingly, and unlike international data where nutritional status has been shown to influence paediatric liver transplant recipient outcomes, [17][18][19][20] our cohort did not demonstrate a statistically significant association between risk of mortality and nutritional status, perhaps because of the decreasing trend towards transplanting moderately and severely malnourished recipients (z-scores <-2). Despite the internationally comparable graft and patient survival rates, our surgical complication rate remains ~60%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%