2005
DOI: 10.1121/1.1835508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indication of a Lombard vocal response in the St. Lawrence River beluga

Abstract: Noise pollution is recognized as a potential danger to marine mammals in general, and to the St. Lawrence beluga in particular. One method of determining the impacts of noise on an animal's communication is to observe a natural and repeatable response of the vocal system to variations in noise level. This is accomplished by observing intensity changes in animal vocalizations in response to environmental noise. One such response observed in humans, songbirds, and some primates is the Lombard vocal response. Thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
87
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, killer whales (Foote et al., 2006), humpback whales, (Risch, Corkeron, Ellison, & Van Parijs, 2012), and common dolphins (May‐Collado & Wartzok, 2008) have been shown to shift their call characteristics out of the frequency bands motorboat sound dominates as well as increasing sound levels (Foote, Osborne, & Hoelzel, 2004; Scheifele et al., 2005). Replayed motorboat sound disrupts the orientation behavior of larval reef fish (Holles et al., 2013), which is a critical stage in replenishing fish populations, and fish recruitment and larval survival was effected by motorboat sound, where Ambon damselfish ( Pomacentrus ambionenis ) exposed to motorboat sound had an increase in oxygen consumption and were more susceptible to predators (Simpson et al., 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, killer whales (Foote et al., 2006), humpback whales, (Risch, Corkeron, Ellison, & Van Parijs, 2012), and common dolphins (May‐Collado & Wartzok, 2008) have been shown to shift their call characteristics out of the frequency bands motorboat sound dominates as well as increasing sound levels (Foote, Osborne, & Hoelzel, 2004; Scheifele et al., 2005). Replayed motorboat sound disrupts the orientation behavior of larval reef fish (Holles et al., 2013), which is a critical stage in replenishing fish populations, and fish recruitment and larval survival was effected by motorboat sound, where Ambon damselfish ( Pomacentrus ambionenis ) exposed to motorboat sound had an increase in oxygen consumption and were more susceptible to predators (Simpson et al., 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where explicitly studied, the Lombard effect has been demonstrated in all nonhuman mammalian species (Hotchkin & Parks, 2013), including several cetacean species (Holt et al, 2009;Parks et al, 2011;Scheifele et al, 2005). In several bird and mammal species, the Lombard effect is associated with a range of other changes in vocal output, including a rise in fundamental frequency (Dabelsteen, 1984;Hotchkin, Parks, & Weiss, 2015;Nelson, 2000;Nemeth et al, 2013;Ritschard & Brumm, 2011;Tressler & Smotherman, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we could not measure whistle source levels, it was not possible for us to determine whether the shifts in frequency we observed were accompanied by amplitude modifications. Previous studies investigating the Lombard effect in cetaceans did not investigate concurrent changes in signal frequency (Holt et al, 2009;Scheifele et al, 2005) or failed to demonstrate a frequency shift associated with increased amplitude (Holt et al, 2015;Parks et al, 2011). However, as this research area is in its infancy, a possible coupling between the Lombard effect and other noise-induced vocal modifications in cetaceans warrants further investigation (Hotchkin & Parks, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most efficient mechanisms is the socalled Lombard effect, i.e., the involuntary rise in call amplitude in response to masking ambient noise (1). This effect was first described in human communication a century ago (2) and has since been found in several species of birds (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) and various mammals (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17), including bats (18). In human speech, several vocal changes, such as a rise in fundamental frequency (19) or lengthening in word duration (20), are often accompanied with the Lombard effect; combined, these changes are referred to as Lombard speech (21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%