“…At this point, we prefer not to draw any definite conclusion from these data, although we note that the tendency observed here for mixed phobane/NHC ruthenium-indenylidene complexes is in line with the 31 P chemical shift gap observed between various other second generation ruthenium-alkylidene catalysts, where the IMes or IDip ligands always lead to a more pronounced deshielding of the trans-phosphane than SIMes or SIDip, even if the difference is sometimes less than 1 ppm [IDip is 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene, SIDip is 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazolin-2-ylidene]. [36,[40][41][42][43] It should be noted that the interpretation of 1 H and 13 C NMR spectra was complicated by the presence of many hardly differentiable signals in the aliphatic and aromatic regions due to the phobane and indenylidene ligands, respectively. [44] Yet, elemental analysis confirmed the identity and purity of complexes 10 and 11.…”