1996
DOI: 10.1016/1359-6454(96)00010-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indentation induced dislocation nucleation: The initial yield point

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
174
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 390 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
174
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 was determined to be 1.8 GPa. If one compares this with the two model calculations in Table 2, the homogeneous dislocation loop model [13] is about a factor of two low and the unstable stacking model using straight dislocations [12], about a factor of three high.…”
Section: Dislocation Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 was determined to be 1.8 GPa. If one compares this with the two model calculations in Table 2, the homogeneous dislocation loop model [13] is about a factor of two low and the unstable stacking model using straight dislocations [12], about a factor of three high.…”
Section: Dislocation Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10] Size effects are observed for pristine crystals, as well. 11,12 In the earliest stages of nanoindentation, for example, the crystal volume is extremely small and can be dislocation-free, requiring very large stresses to nucleate new dislocations. In addition, classic experiments on the initially dislocation-free metal whiskers indicated that whiskers with smaller diameters yielded at higher stresses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] Pure metals and some alloys exhibit strong size effects at the submicron scale. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Size effects in indentation, torsion, and bending have been understood in terms of the nonuniformity of the deformation, which sets up strain gradients leading to hardening. 7 Size effects are also found in thin films, where the strength scales inversely with film thickness and is usually attributed to the confinement of dislocations by the substrate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparent decrease of the contact pressure under the maintained constant rate of displacement increase is tantamount to the pop-in observed during nanoindentation experiments [17][18][19]. Pop-in, alternatively referred to as the yield point, marks the onset of plasticity in defectfree crystals [17][18][19]. For load controlled experiments, pop-in appears as rapid displacement increase whereas its incidence under displacement control is evident as a load drop [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Then the contact pressure continues to gradually decrease approaching hardness (H) of bulk Si at ≈ 12 GPa [9]. The apparent decrease of the contact pressure under the maintained constant rate of displacement increase is tantamount to the pop-in observed during nanoindentation experiments [17][18][19]. Pop-in, alternatively referred to as the yield point, marks the onset of plasticity in defectfree crystals [17][18][19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%