2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10009-014-0317-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental test case generation using bounded model checking: an application to automatic rating

Abstract: In this paper we focus on the task of rating solutions to a programming exercise. State-of-the-art rating methods generally examine each solution against an exhaustive set of test cases, typically designed manually. Hence an issue of completeness arises. We propose the application of bounded model checking to the automatic generation of test cases. The experimental evaluation we have performed reveals a substantial increase in accuracy of ratings at a cost of a moderate increase in computation resources needed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [8], [9], [10] authors propose online exam environments that can prevent cheating actions with preemptive procedures, so that without any proctor they can minimize the number of cheating attempts. In another variation of this approach, preemptive systems are combined with human proctors as in [11], [12] There are automated interview systems that do not have AI-based anti-cheating services like [13], [14]. These systems were designed for an online coding platform to evaluate the candidates.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [8], [9], [10] authors propose online exam environments that can prevent cheating actions with preemptive procedures, so that without any proctor they can minimize the number of cheating attempts. In another variation of this approach, preemptive systems are combined with human proctors as in [11], [12] There are automated interview systems that do not have AI-based anti-cheating services like [13], [14]. These systems were designed for an online coding platform to evaluate the candidates.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems were designed for an online coding platform to evaluate the candidates. Although [13] and [14] have plagiarism services, there is no detection for the presence of multiple persons or electronic device usage. Some approaches like [15] combine autonomous detection systems with human proctors with well-defined pipelines.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%