2016
DOI: 10.15376/biores.12.1.696-703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing the Value Recovery from Short-Rotation Coppice Harvesting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That explains why there are few studies on the integrated production of logs and biomass from short-rotation poplar plantations. The only study conducted on a similar system also used an excavator-based, tilting grapple saw, but it was geared to produce 2-m long logs and performed felling and crosscutting in a direct sequence, without motor-manual delimbing in between (Vanbeveren et al 2017). That study reports a slightly higher felling productivity (9 t SMH −1 vs. 8 t SMH −1 ) and a quite similar log yield (29%), thus offering general corroboration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That explains why there are few studies on the integrated production of logs and biomass from short-rotation poplar plantations. The only study conducted on a similar system also used an excavator-based, tilting grapple saw, but it was geared to produce 2-m long logs and performed felling and crosscutting in a direct sequence, without motor-manual delimbing in between (Vanbeveren et al 2017). That study reports a slightly higher felling productivity (9 t SMH −1 vs. 8 t SMH −1 ) and a quite similar log yield (29%), thus offering general corroboration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system designed was a modification of the method already used by some logging contractors operating in northern Italy, and recently described by Vanbeveren et al (2017). The key equipment in this system is an excavator-based grapple-saw that is used to fell the trees and cut logs from the bottom part of felled stems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search for crops that would meet the criteria of sustainable development and make good raw material for bioenergy and bioeconomy has been the subject of numerous papers [34][35][36], many of which determined specific conditions for their cultivation [37], harvest [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47], and factors affecting the crop per area unit [48] and the impact of cultivation on greenhouse gases (CHG) [49,50] and on the environment [51][52][53]. Mathematical methods were used by Bender et al [54], Hauk et al [55], Salles et al [56], and Sleight et al [57,58] to assess crop yields; by Havlíčková et al [59] to assess the SRC biomass price; and by Frank et al [60] to assess both the minimum selling price and net present value (NPV).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%