2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.01.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased risk of MAFLD and Liver Fibrosis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Independent of Classic Metabolic Risk Factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several sensitivity analyses were used to test the robustness of the results. Based on the fully adjusted models, we further: (1) excluded the incident IBD that occurred in the first 2-year period to reduce the potential reverse causality; (2) excluded individuals with baseline colorectal cancer (identified with ICD-10 code C18, C19, and C20 through cancer registry); (3) excluded participants with concomitant liver diseases (identified with ICD-10 code B16-19, E83.0, E83.1, E88.0, I82.0, K70, K73.2, K73.9, K74.3-5, K75.4, K76.5, K83.0 through inpatient data) other than MAFLD to avoid the confounding effect of other liver diseases [34]; (4) adjusted for the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics, or proton-pump inhibitors; (5) refilled the missing values using multiple imputation method [35]; (6) Excluding new-onset individuals with MAFLD identified in the repeat assessment of the UK Biobank; (7) investigated the association between the AST to ALT ratio and incident IBD as it is a common indicator for liver function test; (8) investigated associations of liver function makers with IBD in subgroups stratified by the normal range of these markers; and (9) evaluated the association between individuals with MAFLD with different probability of advanced fibrosis and risk of IBD. R 4.1.1 and SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several sensitivity analyses were used to test the robustness of the results. Based on the fully adjusted models, we further: (1) excluded the incident IBD that occurred in the first 2-year period to reduce the potential reverse causality; (2) excluded individuals with baseline colorectal cancer (identified with ICD-10 code C18, C19, and C20 through cancer registry); (3) excluded participants with concomitant liver diseases (identified with ICD-10 code B16-19, E83.0, E83.1, E88.0, I82.0, K70, K73.2, K73.9, K74.3-5, K75.4, K76.5, K83.0 through inpatient data) other than MAFLD to avoid the confounding effect of other liver diseases [34]; (4) adjusted for the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics, or proton-pump inhibitors; (5) refilled the missing values using multiple imputation method [35]; (6) Excluding new-onset individuals with MAFLD identified in the repeat assessment of the UK Biobank; (7) investigated the association between the AST to ALT ratio and incident IBD as it is a common indicator for liver function test; (8) investigated associations of liver function makers with IBD in subgroups stratified by the normal range of these markers; and (9) evaluated the association between individuals with MAFLD with different probability of advanced fibrosis and risk of IBD. R 4.1.1 and SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, current studies on the comorbidity of IBD and MAFLD are limited and with few prospective evidence. Data from a cross-sectional study including 2549 Spanish showed a significantly higher prevalence of MAFLD among individuals with IBD than the general population (42% vs. 32%) [6]. But the direction of the association could not be clarified due to the crosssectional design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A measurement was considered to be valid if ten readings with a mean interquartile range lower than 30% were obtained [ 31 ]. Liver stiffness measurements (LSM) were collected in kilopascals (kPa) using specific cut-off values corresponding to different stages of fibrosis, namely ≥5.6 kPa for mild fibrosis (F1), ≥7.2 kPa for significant fibrosis (F2), ≥9.7 kPa for advanced fibrosis (F3), and 12.5 kPa for liver cirrhosis (F4) [ 24 , 32 , 33 ]. CAP values were expressed in decibels/meter (dB/m), with the following cut-off values: ≥248 dB/m for mild steatosis (S1), ≥268 for moderate steatosis (S2), and ≥280 for severe steatosis (S3) [ 34 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although NAFLD can progress to cirrhosis or liver cancer if it worsens to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [1,6], it is unclear whether patients with IBD will develop nonalcoholic steatohepatitis over time. However, the most recent relevant study showed progression of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease to liver brosis in patients with IBD [39]. Moreover, progression of NAFLD is an important factor in the development of IFALD, which is a life-threatening complication in patients with long-term malnutrition caused by chronic intestinal failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%