2003
DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased risk of cholestatic hepatitis C in recipients of grafts from living versus cadaveric liver donors

Abstract: Histologic injury caused by recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been reported in up to 90% of HCV-infected patients who undergo liver transplantation with a cadaveric graft. However, the natural history of HCV after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is not well described. We performed a retrospective analysis of 68 consecutive HCV-infected adult patients: 45 recipients of cadaveric grafts (CAD) were compared with 23 LDLT patients. Elevated serum transaminases, positive HCV RNA, and liver biopsy consi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
99
2
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(34 reference statements)
5
99
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In theory, at least 4 mechanisms might contribute to these higher levels: (1) Cellular proliferation is enhanced, creating a cell population in which the HCV replication rate is higher, as previously discussed 11,23,24 ; (2) The HCV-susceptible cells in LD grafts are in a superior functional state, and this leads to enhanced HCV replication; (3) The LD grafts receive a larger inoculum of virus because of more efficient uptake, coupled with less loss during surgery, and thus they have more foci of viral production; and (4) The smaller size of LD grafts compromises their ability to metabolize drugs, resulting in excessive immunosuppression and reduced antiviral defenses. In all likelihood, several mechanisms, including some not listed above, act in concert.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In theory, at least 4 mechanisms might contribute to these higher levels: (1) Cellular proliferation is enhanced, creating a cell population in which the HCV replication rate is higher, as previously discussed 11,23,24 ; (2) The HCV-susceptible cells in LD grafts are in a superior functional state, and this leads to enhanced HCV replication; (3) The LD grafts receive a larger inoculum of virus because of more efficient uptake, coupled with less loss during surgery, and thus they have more foci of viral production; and (4) The smaller size of LD grafts compromises their ability to metabolize drugs, resulting in excessive immunosuppression and reduced antiviral defenses. In all likelihood, several mechanisms, including some not listed above, act in concert.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,8 Studies of biopsy specimens have yielded conflicting results regarding the severity of recurrent hepatitis and the rate of progressive graft injury. 7,10,11 HCV may interact differently with LD grafts than with DD grafts, and this difference may lead to greater LD graft injury. Exceptionally high HCV RNA levels in the early postoperative period are associated with greater long-term liver damage in DDLT patients, 18,19 and a similar association may exist in LDLT patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 A greater percentage of living donor liver transplant recipients (80%) developed recurrent HCV compared with cadaveric transplant recipients (58%; P Ͻ .05). Severe recurrent HCV infection (fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, Ն grade 3 inflammation, or retransplantation) occurred in 17% of LDLT patients compared with 12% of cadaveric transplantation patients.…”
Section: Hcv and Ldltmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[5][6][7] Data regarding long-term patient and graft survival in HCV-infected living donor liver transplant recipients currently are lacking. The purpose of this report is to review outcomes of LDLT in HCV-infected transplant recipients, define risk factors for severe recurrence, and recommend selection criteria for LDLT in HCV-infected recipients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%