Incorporating sustainability in engineering curriculum: a study of the Australian universities

Abstract

Purpose Literature limited in scope regarding the incorporation of sustainability into engineering curriculum encouraged authors to look at the current approaches of universities to the integration of sustainability into university curricula. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the literature published and analyse the university secondary data (information published on the university websites and magazines and programme catalogues) to understand the current status of Australian universities regarding the integration of sustainability in engineering. Design/methodology/approach Articles and reports from different trustworthy sources have been analysed in this study. A text mining methodology was used to gather information from websites, magazines and programme catalogues. Findings Obtained information and data indicate that the universities are considering sustainability seriously with both internal and external stakeholders of universities working towards embedding sustainability in engineering curricula. Most of the Australian universities have successfully implemented sustainable engineering education and the rest are focussing on integrating sustainability into their engineering education curriculum. Originality/value This is the first review, which focusses on incorporating sustainability into the engineering education of Australian universities. However, considering current progress and also some drawbacks of the universities regarding the integration of sustainability into engineering curriculum, 15 future research questions have been developed, which should be considered to make the integration process more efficient and equip engineers who would be able to engage and tackle the environmental, personal, social and economic challenges of the twenty-first century.

A Comprehensive Review of Nuclear-Renewable Hybrid Energy Systems: Status, Operation, Configuration, Benefit, and Feasibility

“…This study utilized a systemic review of published relevant literature. The method provided by Arefin et al (2021) was followed in this study. The following steps were considered while conduction the systemic review (Amui et al, 2017).…”

Assessing Education for Sustainable Development in Engineering Study Programs: A Case of AI Ecosystem Creation

“…Nowadays, research is related to setting the number of study modules that appear in engineering study programs related to sustainability [23,26,27], the benefits of sustainability in an engineering curriculum [28,29] and emerging challenges in engineering education [16]. Research studies reveal that the main advantage is that the integration of sustainability into curriculum design, implementation, and evaluation inspires greater social responsibility in engineering students' decision-making processes.…”

“…In some SPs only one study module which has a sustainability dimension can be integrated, whereas in others sustainability can be developed through several competencies. Furthermore, there may be SPs in which sustainability can cover the entire scope of the study program and although there are many studies that analyze the extent to which sustainability issues have emerged in studies, emphasizing that they are growing, the main problem is that sustainability education, including such important aspects as its assessment, is unsystematic [26,42].…”

Sustainability integration in Palestinian universities: a focus on teaching and research at engineering faculties

“…To integrate and implement sustainability topics at the universities, the approach could include resources for research programmes and education curricula and research and teaching capacity building for staff (Ralph and Stubbs, 2014; Ellis and Weekes, 2008; Arefin et al , 2021). Integrative approaches for incorporating sustainability principles into universities’ research and teaching activities to achieve sustainable development are not only needed, but they are also effective in implementing sustainable practice (Leal Filho et al , 2015a, 2015b).…”