Income inequality and shadow economy: a nonparametric and semiparametric analysis

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the nonlinear relationship between shadow economy and income inequality and determine whether the size of shadow economy can influence the level of income inequality. Design/methodology/approach Both parametric (panel OLS) and nonparametric/semiparametric regression suggested by Robinson (1988) will be used to capture the dynamic nonlinear relationship between these variables using unbalanced panel data of 154 countries from 2000 to 2007. Additionally, the relationship between income inequality and shadow economy on both developed and developing countries will be analyzed and compared. Findings First, semiparametric analysis and nonparametric analysis are significantly different than parametric analysis and better in nonlinear analysis between income inequality and shadow economy. Second, income inequality and shadow economy resemble an inverted-N relationship. Third, the relationship between income inequality and shadow economy is different in developed countries (OECD countries) and developing countries, where OECD countries have similar inverted-N relationship as before. However, for developing countries, income inequality and shadow economy show an inverted-U relationship, similar to the original Kuznets hypothesis. Practical implications This study suggests that there is a possible trade-off between income inequality and shadow economy and helps policy makers in solving both problems effectively. Originality/value Despite the growing importance of income inequality and shadow economy, literature linking the two variables is scarce. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is no literature that nonlinearly links these two variables. Furthermore, the dynamics of the relationship between these two variables in developed countries and developing countries will be explored as well.

Revisiting the effects of natural resources on income inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa

“…The OLS results (Column 1) however show that income level does not have a statistically significant effect on income inequality. This result is contrary to those obtained by Yap et al (2018), Alvarado et al (2021) following their examination of the determinants of income inequality. On the other hand, the quantile results show that income has a negative effect on income inequality when its distribution is low, as evidenced in columns 1 and 2.…”

Shadow economy in Palestinian territories using currency demand approach

“…Finally, a study by Kanao and Hamori (2010) applied to Japan from 1971 to 2007 found that the size of the SE was about 25% on average of the GDP. Yap et al (2018) investigated the non-linear relationship between SE and income inequality and determined whether the SE size influences the level of income inequality. The study found that income inequality and SE resemble an inverted-N relationship, as in developed countries (OECD) (Celikay, 2020).…”

Digitalization Of The Russian Economy In The Context Of Technological Changes

“…It gives the ability to put forward innovative ideas thanks to the imagination of the individual. Mainly, this form of intellectual creativity provides the movement of the force of scientific and technological progress, it was it that determined the development of modern Russian society (Yap et al, 2018).…”