2019
DOI: 10.1101/785881
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Including measures of high gamma power can improve the decoding of natural speech from EEG

Abstract: ABSTRACTThe human auditory system is adept at extracting information from speech in both single-speaker and multi-speaker situations. This involves neural processing at the rapid temporal scales seen in natural speech. Non-invasive brain imaging (electro-/magnetoencephalography [EEG/MEG]) signatures of such processing have shown that the phase of neural activity below 16 Hz tracks the dynamics of speech, whereas invasive brain imaging (electrocorticography [ECoG]) has shown tha… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(50 reference statements)
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we asked whether these are represented in a similar manner as real speech. In large our data show that this is indeed the case: Envelopes were tracked over fronto-central electrodes at EEG frequencies below 8 Hz, consistent with previous studies (Drennan and Lalor, 2019; Etard and Reichenbach, 2019; Kayser et al, 2015; Mai and Wang, 2019; Synigal et al, 2019). However, the envelopes derived from a higher spectral range (defined here as 2.66 – 8 kHz) were reflected in spatially distinct EEG topographies compared to the envelopes from the lower spectral range (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Specifically, we asked whether these are represented in a similar manner as real speech. In large our data show that this is indeed the case: Envelopes were tracked over fronto-central electrodes at EEG frequencies below 8 Hz, consistent with previous studies (Drennan and Lalor, 2019; Etard and Reichenbach, 2019; Kayser et al, 2015; Mai and Wang, 2019; Synigal et al, 2019). However, the envelopes derived from a higher spectral range (defined here as 2.66 – 8 kHz) were reflected in spatially distinct EEG topographies compared to the envelopes from the lower spectral range (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A second direction is to improve EEG analysis. Standard models (including those reported here) exploit low-frequency components within the EEG, but useful information may also be carried by high-frequency power (Synigal et al, 2020;Forte et al, 2017;Teoh et al, 2019). If the relevant sources have low SNR, they may not be exploitable without appropriate spatial filtering, but standard linear techniques to find the filters (such as CCA) are not directly applicable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second direction is to improve EEG analysis. Standard models (including those reported here) exploit low-frequency components within the EEG, but useful information may also be carried by high-frequency power (Synigal et al, 2020; Forte et al, 2017; Teoh et al, 2019). If the relevant sources have low SNR, they may not be exploitable without appropriate spatial filtering, but standard linear techniques to find the filters (such as CCA) are not directly applicable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second direction is to extract more information from the brain response. Typical models (including those reported here) exploit low-frequency components, but useful information may also be carried by high-frequency power (Synigal et al, 2020; Forte et al, 2017; Teoh et al, 2019). Standard linear techniques (such as CCA) are not directly applicable to enhance weak sources of power, but it may be possible to use quadratic component analysis (QCA) for that purpose (de Cheveigné, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%