2001
DOI: 10.1080/02601370120116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Include me out: critical readings of social exclusion, social inclusion and lifelong learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…EU policy documents make specific reference to the contribution of lifelong learning in reducing social exclusion and promoting equal opportunities (European Commission 1995, 2001b Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 1996). There is, however, some concern about the lifelong learning discourse excluding particular groups from the learning society (Edwards et al 2001;Gorard 2003). Recently, there has been much debate over the potential associated with information and communication technology (ICT), to overcome barriers such as distance and time (Barraket 2004) and international as well as Belgian policy documents that promote ICT to foster lifelong learning (Vlaamse Regering 2000;European Commission 2001a;Op den Kamp 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EU policy documents make specific reference to the contribution of lifelong learning in reducing social exclusion and promoting equal opportunities (European Commission 1995, 2001b Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 1996). There is, however, some concern about the lifelong learning discourse excluding particular groups from the learning society (Edwards et al 2001;Gorard 2003). Recently, there has been much debate over the potential associated with information and communication technology (ICT), to overcome barriers such as distance and time (Barraket 2004) and international as well as Belgian policy documents that promote ICT to foster lifelong learning (Vlaamse Regering 2000;European Commission 2001a;Op den Kamp 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrenchment of state coordination and/or support for heavy industry coupled with reorganisation and marketisation of the welfare state and public services brought considerable upheaval to working communities and led to a decollectivisation which had implications for trade unions (discussed later). Subsequent state-driven strategies to regenerate localities and reduce unemployment have tended to concentrate on the quantitative creation of employment opportunities; these have attracted criticism on the grounds that the jobs that are created are often insecure, low-skilled and low-paid, and that social exclusion cannot merely be tackled by economic interventions alone (Edwards et al, 2001;Wills, 2004).…”
Section: The Context: New Local Governance and Trade Union Renewalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inclusion, in this new configuration, is thus a shared responsibility, among professionals and involving parents, and one where the lines of accountability are (even) less clear. The implication within policies on inclusion, especially those urging joined up working, is that it can be achieved through improved governance and service delivery, but as Edwards, Armstrong and Miller (2001) point out, this contradicts the idea that exclusion and inequality are actually created through 'the economic mode of production' (420). Pijl and Frissen (2009), casting a look across Europe, argue that the interventions in schools by policymakers, in an attempt to make them more inclusive, are misplaced because they treat schools as 'machine bureacracies', rather than professional ones.…”
Section: Shifting Political and Policy Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%