2019
DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and Risks for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Steatohepatitis Post-liver Transplant: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract: Background. The true incidence and unique risk factors for recurrent and de novo nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) post-liver transplant (LT) remain poorly characterized. We aimed to identify the incidence and risk factors for recurrent and de novo NAFLD/NASH post-LT. Methods. MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL were searched for studies from 2000 to 2018. Risk of bias was adjudicated using the Newcastle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
89
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Considering all the metabolic complications potentially affecting patients after LT, the risk of developing post-transplant NAFLD/NASH can be considered high, although studies published on this topic are based on small sample sizes, with heterogeneous definitions of disease recurrence. 23 In a meta-analysis, the mean 1-, 3-, and 5-year incidence rates of recurrent and de novo NAFLD were 59%, 57%, 82% and 67%, 40%, 78%, respectively. Conversely, the incidence of post-transplant NASH was significantly higher when considering recurrent NASH (53%, 57.4%, and 38% at 1, 3, 5 years after LT, respectively) compared with de novo NASH (13%, 16%, and 17%, respectively).…”
Section: Epidemiology and Natural History Of Nafld In The Lt Settingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…22 Considering all the metabolic complications potentially affecting patients after LT, the risk of developing post-transplant NAFLD/NASH can be considered high, although studies published on this topic are based on small sample sizes, with heterogeneous definitions of disease recurrence. 23 In a meta-analysis, the mean 1-, 3-, and 5-year incidence rates of recurrent and de novo NAFLD were 59%, 57%, 82% and 67%, 40%, 78%, respectively. Conversely, the incidence of post-transplant NASH was significantly higher when considering recurrent NASH (53%, 57.4%, and 38% at 1, 3, 5 years after LT, respectively) compared with de novo NASH (13%, 16%, and 17%, respectively).…”
Section: Epidemiology and Natural History Of Nafld In The Lt Settingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Conversely, the incidence of post-transplant NASH was significantly higher when considering recurrent NASH (53%, 57.4%, and 38% at 1, 3, 5 years after LT, respectively) compared with de novo NASH (13%, 16%, and 17%, respectively). 23 Regarding advanced liver disease, the reported rates of cirrhosis in patients with recurrent or de novo NAFLD are around 11%-14% and 1% at 5 years post-LT, respectively. 23 Post-transplant high BMI, post-transplant hyperlipidaemia, and a history of alcohol abuse are considered predictors of post-LT graft steatosis.…”
Section: Epidemiology and Natural History Of Nafld In The Lt Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Jedoch auch nach Transplantation aufgrund einer NAFLD-assoziierten Leberzirrhose kann es zu einem Rezidiv kommen. In einer rezenten Metaanalyse konnte gezeigt werden, dass die 5-Jahres-Inzidenz der rekurrenten NAFLD bei 82 % liegt und mit einer erhöhten Mortalität einhergehen kann [13]. Eine Kontrolle der metabolischen Risikofaktoren erscheint daher obligat.…”
Section: Wiederauftreten Der Grunderkrankung Nach Lebertransplantationunclassified