2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo investigation of 3D printed polycaprolactone/graphene electro-active bone scaffolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1] To date, the main guideline for these defects is autografts, allografts, and xenografting which suffer from some drawbacks such as limited bone donor supply, indicating insufficient reproducibility, limited ability to adjust pore geometry and pore size, the necessity of additional surgery and immune rejection. [2][3][4] Hence, to address these issues, bone tissue engineering has been introduced to regenerate specific and functional human bone tissue. [5] Scaffolds play a central role in tissue engineering and serve as a temporary template to provide structural supports for guiding cells and constructing new tissue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] To date, the main guideline for these defects is autografts, allografts, and xenografting which suffer from some drawbacks such as limited bone donor supply, indicating insufficient reproducibility, limited ability to adjust pore geometry and pore size, the necessity of additional surgery and immune rejection. [2][3][4] Hence, to address these issues, bone tissue engineering has been introduced to regenerate specific and functional human bone tissue. [5] Scaffolds play a central role in tissue engineering and serve as a temporary template to provide structural supports for guiding cells and constructing new tissue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several articles implementing GO also showed faster bone formation, 45,54,98 an important benefit given that in vivo regeneration requires faster resolution to guarantee better long-term results. All articles reviewed using different types of graphene (Graphene, GO, RGO and other) showed an increase in bone formation, but six of GO, 31,35,45,64,77,98 two of pure graphene, 79,110 and one of RGO 102 articles showed also accelerated osteogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the biodegradability character of PLA and PCL thermoplastic polymers has listed them among the group of polymeric inks in 3D printing. PLA and PCL are used not only for bioprinting applications but also for drug delivery, bone regeneration [29], and dermal scaffold and human skin-based projects [30]. PCL also has high solubility and combination characteristics with other polymers as a biodegradable, hydrophobic, and semi-crystalline polymer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%