2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo evaluation of (+)-MR200 as a new selective sigma ligand modulating MOP, DOP and KOP supraspinal analgesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
33
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A dose as low as 2 mg/kg naloxone methiodide was enough to completely abolish the opioid antinociception induced by all m agonists tested, not only in WT mice treated locally with a s 1 antagonist (in which its effects are clearly peripherally mediated), but also in s 1 -KO mice or WT mice treated systemically with the s 1 antagonists. This does not argue against the widely reported potentiation of opioid antinociception by central s 1 receptor inhibition (King et al, 1997;Pan et al, 1998;Pasternak, 2002, 2007;Marrazzo et al, 2006) but indicates that, when both opioid agonism and s 1 inhibition are induced systemically, the increase in antinociception occurs mainly at the peripheral level. In support of the peripheral location of these modulatory effects of s 1 receptors, we found much higher levels of these receptors in the DRG than in several areas of the central nervous system that play a key role in opioid antinociception.…”
Section: Modulation Of Peripheral M-opioidmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A dose as low as 2 mg/kg naloxone methiodide was enough to completely abolish the opioid antinociception induced by all m agonists tested, not only in WT mice treated locally with a s 1 antagonist (in which its effects are clearly peripherally mediated), but also in s 1 -KO mice or WT mice treated systemically with the s 1 antagonists. This does not argue against the widely reported potentiation of opioid antinociception by central s 1 receptor inhibition (King et al, 1997;Pan et al, 1998;Pasternak, 2002, 2007;Marrazzo et al, 2006) but indicates that, when both opioid agonism and s 1 inhibition are induced systemically, the increase in antinociception occurs mainly at the peripheral level. In support of the peripheral location of these modulatory effects of s 1 receptors, we found much higher levels of these receptors in the DRG than in several areas of the central nervous system that play a key role in opioid antinociception.…”
Section: Modulation Of Peripheral M-opioidmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…However, s 1 inhibition is able to enhance opioid signaling (Kim et al, 2010) and to potentiate the antinociceptive effect of systemic opioids Pasternak, 1993, 1994;Marrazzo et al, 2011;Sánchez-Fernández et al, 2013;Vidal-Torres et al, 2013). Opioid antinociception can be potentiated by central s 1 inhibition (King et al, 1997;Pan et al, 1998;Pasternak, 2002, 2007;Marrazzo et al, 2006), and we recently reported that the local peripheral coadministration of s 1 antagonists and morphine also resulted in markedly enhanced antinociception (Sánchez-Fernández et al, 2013). However, it is unknown whether peripheral mechanisms are involved in the antinociception induced by systemic opioids when s 1 receptors are inhibited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nociception was evaluated by the radiant heat tail-flick test (Marrazzo et al, 2006). Briefly, this consisted of irradiation of the lower third of the tail with an infrared source (Ugo Basile, Comerio, Italy).…”
Section: Nociceptive Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sigma receptors have been reported to play an important role in the modulation of analgesia produced by µ-, δ-or κ-opioid receptor agonists (Mei and Pasternak, 2002;Marrazzo et al, 2006;Chien and Pasternak, 1994). (+)-Pentazocine antagonizes (−)-morphine-produced analgesia, which is reversed by sigma receptor antagonist haloperidol (Chien and Pasternak, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%