In-vivo assessment of meniscal movement in the knee joint during internal and external rotation under load

Abstract

Purpose The menisci transmit load between femur and tibia and thus play a crucial role in the functionality of the knee joint. Knee joint movements have a major impact on the position of the menisci. However, these meniscus movements have not yet been assessed in a validated setting. The objective of this study is to evaluate the meniscal movements in MRI with prospective motion correction based on optical tracking under loading via internal and external tibial torques. Methods Thirty-one healthy volunteers were recruited for this study. MRI scans were performed in internal and external rotation induced by a torque of 5 Nm, using a 3 T MRI. A validated software used the generated images to calculate the absolute meniscus movements as the sum of all vectors. Differences between subgroups were analyzed by using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results The MM shows an average movement of 1.79 mm in anterior-lateral direction under internal rotation and 6.01 mm in posterior-lateral direction under external rotation, whereas the LM moves an average of 4.55 mm in posterior-medial direction under internal rotation and 3.58 mm in anterior-medial direction under external rotation. When comparing the overall meniscus movements between internal and external rotation, statistically significant differences were found for total vector length and the direction of meniscus movements for medial and lateral meniscus. The comparison between medial and lateral meniscus movements also showed statistically significant differences in all categories for internal and external rotation. Conclusions Overall, the MM and LM movements in internal and external rotation differ significantly in extent and direction, although MM and LM movements in opposite directions during internal and external rotation can be observed. In internal rotation, most meniscus movements were found in the IHLM. In external rotation, the IHMM showed the greatest mobility. Segment analysis of internal vs. external rotation showed less difference in LM movements than MM. Level of evidence Level II.

Excessive Knee Internal Rotation during Grand Plié in Classical Ballet Female Dancers

“…In a study by Park et al [ 49 ], the risk of ACL injury was investigated in athletes engaged in pivoting activities, measuring knee joint laxity and rotational range in extreme internal and external tibial rotation. They noted significant differences in the maximum passive external tibial rotation between males and females, with excessive tibial rotation being identified as a major risk factor for proprioception loss and injuries like meniscus tears [ 49 , 50 , 51 ]. Supporting these findings, LaPrade and Burnett [ 52 ] characterized knee injuries as resulting from sudden, excessive twisting loads applied to a flexed, planted knee, leading to lateral femoral condyle impingement.…”

Validation of a Finite Element Simulation for Predicting Individual Knee Joint Kinematics

“…Furthermore, assessment of meniscal or ligament tears can be accomplished with this modeling approach [5] , [14] , [15] . In-vivo analysis of meniscal motion under internal and external rotation torque using a measurement setup including a loading device and MR imaging has been demonstrated recently [16] .…”

A new tibial insert design with ball‐in‐socket medial conformity and posterior cruciate ligament retention closely restores native knee tibial rotation after unrestricted kinematic alignment

“…At 90° flexion, an insert without posterolateral conformity enabled 5° more internal tibial orientation than one with posterolateral conformity [6]. Hence, an insert with a flat lateral articular surface replicates the relative freedom‐of‐movement of the native knee’s lateral compartment [7].…”