2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00344-009-9133-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Micropropagation of Freesia hybrida and the Assessment of Genetic and Epigenetic Stability in Regenerated Plantlets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our conditions, the number of methylation changes per plant was small and the resulting total polymorphism was \1 % independently of the age of the cell culture, indicating little disruption to the epigenetic Values are means of 3-4 independent measurements ± SD status. Similarly, low levels of methylation variation were found in freesia somatic seedlings derived from short-term cultures (Gao et al 2010) and pea long-term multiple shoot cultures (Smýkal et al 2007). Many studies with methylation-sensitive molecular markers that reported a high level of epigenetic variation reported no effect on phenotype or morpho-agronomic traits (Bednarek et al 2007;Li et al 2007;Schellenbaum et al 2008;Fiuk et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In our conditions, the number of methylation changes per plant was small and the resulting total polymorphism was \1 % independently of the age of the cell culture, indicating little disruption to the epigenetic Values are means of 3-4 independent measurements ± SD status. Similarly, low levels of methylation variation were found in freesia somatic seedlings derived from short-term cultures (Gao et al 2010) and pea long-term multiple shoot cultures (Smýkal et al 2007). Many studies with methylation-sensitive molecular markers that reported a high level of epigenetic variation reported no effect on phenotype or morpho-agronomic traits (Bednarek et al 2007;Li et al 2007;Schellenbaum et al 2008;Fiuk et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As the methylation-sensitive isoschizomers MspI and HpaII differ in their sensitivity to cytosine methylation (Lei et al, 2006;Schulz et al, 2013;Yaish et al, 2014), the comparison of the differential digestion pattern generated by each enzyme allows us to identify the methylation status of the DNA. The MSAP technique has been considered efficient in the detection and characterization of somaclonal variants in several crops (Lei et al, 2006;Gao et al, 2010;Bobadilla Landey et al, 2013). Despite the economic importance of sugarcane and also the impact of tissue culture technique to this crop, reports on the methylation status of sugarcane plants derived from tissue culture have not been published yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En los explantes de Hedysarum theinum también con regeneración adventicia no se afectó al genotipo (Erst et al, 2015) y en Nothapodytes foetida, tampoco se encontró variación en los regenerantes obtenidos de manera adventicia (Chandrika et al, 2010). En varios trabajos se ha reportado que son varios los factores que influyen en la variación genética entre ellos la vía regenerativa de manera indirecta, sin embargo no es regla el hecho que los cultivos de regeneración directa estables tienen menor riesgo de variación somaclonal y los que pasan por una fase de callo presentan mayor probabilidad de variación (Tang, 2001;Gao et al, 2010;Bairu et al, 2011). Esto se comprueba en este trabajo con los brotes regenerados en un medio conteniendo dicha combinación (Fig.…”
Section: Vía De Regeneración Sub-cultivosunclassified