2016
DOI: 10.2174/1389201017666160415155359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: The oral cavity, which harbors more than 750 bacterial species, is one of the most diverse sites of the human body. Some of these bacteria have been associated with oral diseases, such as dental caries and endodontic infections. We report on the antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of Copaifera oblongifolia oleoresin against bacteria that cause caries and endodontic infections. The aim of this study is to determine the minimum (MIC) and the bactericidal (MBC) inhibitory concentrations as well as the biofilm … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Copaiba oil, regardless of its genus, presented results of bactericidal and/or bacteriostatic effect. The most studied microorganisms against copaiba in this systematic review were Streptococcus mutans (Bardají et al, 2016;Bari et al, 2016;Conde et al, 2015;da Silva Moraes et al, 2016;Dias et al, 2015;Pieri et al, 2010;Pieri et al, 2012;Simões et al, 2016;Vasconcelos et al, 2008) followed by Streptococcus sanguinis (Bardají et al, 2016;da Silva Moraes et al, 2016;Simões et al, 2016;Vasconcelos et al, 2008), Streptococcus sobrinus (Bardají et al, 2016;Conde et al, 2015;da Silva Moraes et al, 2016;, Fusobacterium nucleatum (Bardají et al, 2016;, . Only one study demonstrated that copaiba oil presented antimicrobial effect similar or superior to the positive control used (Pieri et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Copaiba oil, regardless of its genus, presented results of bactericidal and/or bacteriostatic effect. The most studied microorganisms against copaiba in this systematic review were Streptococcus mutans (Bardají et al, 2016;Bari et al, 2016;Conde et al, 2015;da Silva Moraes et al, 2016;Dias et al, 2015;Pieri et al, 2010;Pieri et al, 2012;Simões et al, 2016;Vasconcelos et al, 2008) followed by Streptococcus sanguinis (Bardají et al, 2016;da Silva Moraes et al, 2016;Simões et al, 2016;Vasconcelos et al, 2008), Streptococcus sobrinus (Bardají et al, 2016;Conde et al, 2015;da Silva Moraes et al, 2016;, Fusobacterium nucleatum (Bardají et al, 2016;, . Only one study demonstrated that copaiba oil presented antimicrobial effect similar or superior to the positive control used (Pieri et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Four thousand five hundred and thirty-five titles/abstracts were retrieved from the search strategy, of which 2,474 were excluded for being duplicated. Based on the previously described criteria, 84 full titles were evaluated, of which 11 were selected (Bardají et al, 2016;Bari et al, 2016;Conde et al, 2015;da Silva Moraes et al, 2016;Dias et al, 2015;Pieri et al, 2010;Pieri, Mussi, Fiorini, Moreira, & Schneedorf, 2012;Simões et al, 2016;Vasconcelos, Veiga Júnior, Rocha, & Bandeira, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations