2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2006.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ methane hydrate dissociation with carbon dioxide sequestration: Current knowledge and issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
129
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
129
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(1.13); δ 0 is the reference porosity, which is normally chosen as the total porosity δ; is a parameter that determines the decreasing rate of absolute permeability with δ e . This work uses = 0.5 from an assessment of the data from literature (Goel, 2006).…”
Section: Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(1.13); δ 0 is the reference porosity, which is normally chosen as the total porosity δ; is a parameter that determines the decreasing rate of absolute permeability with δ e . This work uses = 0.5 from an assessment of the data from literature (Goel, 2006).…”
Section: Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative permeabilities of gas and aqueous phases would be given by a Corey model (Goel, 2006 In Eqs. (1.18) and (1.19), the residual aqueous phase saturation and gas phase saturation, S wr and S gr , are based on the pore volume occupied by fluid phases (namely effective pore volume).…”
Section: Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the equilibrium condition, porous media may affect other thermodynamic properties of hydrates. For example, in Goel's (2006) review of CH 4 production with CO 2 sequestration, a number of contrasting observations were revealed concerning the in-situ enthalpy of dissociation of CO 2 and CH 4 hydrates. Some research indicated that there was an increase in the heat of dissociation between in-situ and ex-situ conditions; whereas, other research indicated the opposite.…”
Section: Gas Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In geologic media that have distribution of pore sizes, hydrates would form and dissociate over a range of temperatures and pressures according to the distribution of pore radii and accounting for the impact of salts in the residual pore water (MCGRAIL et al, 2007). The critical conclusion from Goel's (2006) drates in porous media is that to understand the gas exchange technology there is a need for quantitative estimates of formation and dissociation processes in geologic media core samples.…”
Section: Gas Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%