2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In silico Mechano-Chemical Model of Bone Healing for the Regeneration of Critical Defects: The Effect of BMP-2

Abstract: The healing of bone defects is a challenge for both tissue engineering and modern orthopaedics. This problem has been addressed through the study of scaffold constructs combined with mechanoregulatory theories, disregarding the influence of chemical factors and their respective delivery devices. Of the chemical factors involved in the bone healing process, bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) has been identified as one of the most powerful osteoinductive proteins. The aim of this work is to develop and validat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The apparent retention of BMP-2 was estimated from the measured release over time and expressed as a percentage of the total BMP-2 loaded [40]. BMP-2 release/retention kinetics have previously been represented using exponential decay [11, 40, 42]. Accordingly, BMP-2 retention data for each sample was fit to an exponential decay function, and the rate of decay λ was estimated [40].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparent retention of BMP-2 was estimated from the measured release over time and expressed as a percentage of the total BMP-2 loaded [40]. BMP-2 release/retention kinetics have previously been represented using exponential decay [11, 40, 42]. Accordingly, BMP-2 retention data for each sample was fit to an exponential decay function, and the rate of decay λ was estimated [40].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, simulations of the initial bone healing phases, such as inflammation, granulation tissue formation, and callus development have not been frequently modeled (Isaksson et al, 2007, Gómez-Benito et al, 2005a, Ribeiro et al, 2015). This may be partly due to mechanical factors playing a lessor role in this phase, while biological and chemical factors are much more significant (Pivonka and Dunstan, 2012, Claes et al, 2012).…”
Section: Steps Of Healing Included In Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…uniform or peripheral seeding) (Checa and Prendergast, 2010), type of growth factors (i.e. chondrogenic growth factors such as BMP-2/4 or osteogenic growth factor such as TGF-β1) (Geris et al, 2008, BailÓN-Plaza and Van Der Meulen, 2001, Bailón-Plaza and van der Meulen, 2003, Ribeiro et al, 2015, Geris et al, 2006), release duration (BailÓN-Plaza and Van Der Meulen, 2001, Bailón-Plaza and van der Meulen, 2003), scaffold implantation (Ribeiro et al, 2015, Checa and Prendergast, 2010), or mechanical loading effects (Geris et al, 2010a, Checa and Prendergast, 2010). …”
Section: Clinical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study area, finite element modeling (FEM) simulation can be a fundamental tool to predict the appropriate microenvironment formulation, to achieve an effective biochemical signal delivery within the scaffold per unit volume along all the cultivation time, both static than dynamic. Indeed, a great variety of mathematical tools have been developed for modeling 3D bioengineered scaffolds, in terms of both cellular behavior and their response to growth factors (Gómez‐Benito, García‐Aznar, Kuiper, & Doblaré, ; Ribeiro, Gomez‐Benito, Folgado, Fernandes, & Garçia‐Aznar, ). However, despite several FEM modeling approaches, proposed in the recent literature, for the prediction of nutrients and oxygen mass transfer (Curcio et al, ; Ye, Dasa, Triffitt, & Cui, ), a FEM simulation within 3D bioengineered scaffold with microcarriers for the growth factor controlled delivery study was never described.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%