2022
DOI: 10.1080/00218839.2022.2080950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In pursuit of the ultimate pollen substitute (insect larvae) for honey bee ( Apis mellifera ) feed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to acting as resource cues, the ingestion of fungi or fungal metabolites can also affect individual bee and colony performance, though these effects differ by fungal and bee species. Inactivated yeasts (most commonly Saccharomyces cerevisiae ) are common additives in artificial diets provided to social bee colonies, in some cases providing modest growth benefits over natural pollen diets (Fernandes-da-Silva and Zucoloto 1990 , Dodologlu and Emsen 2011 , van der Steen 2015 , Pavlović et al 2022 ), though not always (Costa and Venturieri 2015 , de Freitas et al 2020 ). There is little evidence that these artificial diets have any impact on bee immunity and pathogen infection (Moliné et al 2020 , Canché-Collí et al 2021 , Hsu et al 2021 ), though in one case yeast diets reduced Nosema spp.…”
Section: Functions Of Bee-associated Fungimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to acting as resource cues, the ingestion of fungi or fungal metabolites can also affect individual bee and colony performance, though these effects differ by fungal and bee species. Inactivated yeasts (most commonly Saccharomyces cerevisiae ) are common additives in artificial diets provided to social bee colonies, in some cases providing modest growth benefits over natural pollen diets (Fernandes-da-Silva and Zucoloto 1990 , Dodologlu and Emsen 2011 , van der Steen 2015 , Pavlović et al 2022 ), though not always (Costa and Venturieri 2015 , de Freitas et al 2020 ). There is little evidence that these artificial diets have any impact on bee immunity and pathogen infection (Moliné et al 2020 , Canché-Collí et al 2021 , Hsu et al 2021 ), though in one case yeast diets reduced Nosema spp.…”
Section: Functions Of Bee-associated Fungimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier studies concluded that the composition of the food is more important than the amount of food con- This could indicate that the larvae from infected hives consumed a more uniform diet that is rich in macroelements, but lacking in microelements, compared to larvae from healthy hives, where the larvae are fed based on diverse food sources. Earlier studies concluded that the composition of the food is more important than the amount of food consumed [35]. It could be that honey bees from the infected hives either collected less pollen or the pollen collected was of a lower diversity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We had to develop a new method of keeping bees in vitro for flight experiments, as previous trials of flight experiments with caged honey bees failed (R. Brodschneider, unpublished data). Because healthy bees do neither defecate in their nest, nor in a cage (see Pavlović et al, 2022), the ventriculus (midgut) and rectum of caged bees are densely filled with undigested pollen, water, and feces. The pressure of the well-stocked intestine on the tracheal system (including collapsible air sacs) hinders optimal oxygen delivery and hence flight.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slight drawbacks in flight of honey bees in freeflying environments could be more dramatic, as bees may fail in returning to the colony after unsuccessful attempts (Harrison et al, 2001). Pollen substitutes optimized for the bees' needs could partly support their thorax development when there is insufficient or only nutritionally deficient pollen available in the environment (Pavlović et al, 2022;Ricigliano et al, 2022). In our experiment we established a very drastic all-or-nothing situation regarding pollen availability of the two experimental groups.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%