2013
DOI: 10.1016/s0104-1843(13)50028-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Hospital Outcomes on Patients Submitted to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Rescue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this lower age at presentation is consistent with other studies on acute MI in broader, more representative populations in Sri Lanka (not necessarily undergoing primary PCI), and probably reflects premature atherosclerosis that is commonly seen in the country 18 . To further highlight the relatively younger age population in our study, we compared it with two other similar studies – where the common age groups spanned from the late 50′s to early 60′s 6, 10. (Table 3)…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, this lower age at presentation is consistent with other studies on acute MI in broader, more representative populations in Sri Lanka (not necessarily undergoing primary PCI), and probably reflects premature atherosclerosis that is commonly seen in the country 18 . To further highlight the relatively younger age population in our study, we compared it with two other similar studies – where the common age groups spanned from the late 50′s to early 60′s 6, 10. (Table 3)…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…There was no significant difference in the mortality rates between rescue and primary PCI (5.1% vs. 3.8%; p = 0.67). The mortality rates from our study were reflected in other similar studies as well, that is with no significant difference between rescue and primary PCI 6, 10. Data regarding the Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) which occurred in the two PCI strategies were recorded (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations