“…However, this lower age at presentation is consistent with other studies on acute MI in broader, more representative populations in Sri Lanka (not necessarily undergoing primary PCI), and probably reflects premature atherosclerosis that is commonly seen in the country 18 . To further highlight the relatively younger age population in our study, we compared it with two other similar studies – where the common age groups spanned from the late 50′s to early 60′s 6, 10. (Table 3)…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…There was no significant difference in the mortality rates between rescue and primary PCI (5.1% vs. 3.8%; p = 0.67). The mortality rates from our study were reflected in other similar studies as well, that is with no significant difference between rescue and primary PCI 6, 10. Data regarding the Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) which occurred in the two PCI strategies were recorded (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Notably, these results were also transferred to patients who underwent rescue PCI 8 . These findings were supported by randomized trials that assessed the performance of PCI after thrombolysis treatment6, 9, 10 which included a similar trend in mortality in these patients. Table 3 compares variables from two different studies6, 10 along with ours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Results in our study showed that the incidence of MACE occurred at a similar rate when the two strategies were compared (7.7% s. 12.4%; p = 0.33). In a comparison study conducted in Brazil, the frequency of MACE was also insignificant between the two groups (6.3% vs. 6.9%; p = 0.89) 10 . None of the patients required an emergency by-pass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Therefore, depending on available facilities for early PCI, both primary and rescue PCI strategies are proving to be effective for coronary reperfusion 10 . The objective of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of the outcomes of rescue and primary PCI performed at the Cardiology Unit-5, NHSL over a period of 2 years (March 2013–April 2015).…”
In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) are similar in both rescue and primary intervention groups, supporting the former as a practical option for patients with no immediate access to PCI facilities.
“…However, this lower age at presentation is consistent with other studies on acute MI in broader, more representative populations in Sri Lanka (not necessarily undergoing primary PCI), and probably reflects premature atherosclerosis that is commonly seen in the country 18 . To further highlight the relatively younger age population in our study, we compared it with two other similar studies – where the common age groups spanned from the late 50′s to early 60′s 6, 10. (Table 3)…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…There was no significant difference in the mortality rates between rescue and primary PCI (5.1% vs. 3.8%; p = 0.67). The mortality rates from our study were reflected in other similar studies as well, that is with no significant difference between rescue and primary PCI 6, 10. Data regarding the Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) which occurred in the two PCI strategies were recorded (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Notably, these results were also transferred to patients who underwent rescue PCI 8 . These findings were supported by randomized trials that assessed the performance of PCI after thrombolysis treatment6, 9, 10 which included a similar trend in mortality in these patients. Table 3 compares variables from two different studies6, 10 along with ours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Results in our study showed that the incidence of MACE occurred at a similar rate when the two strategies were compared (7.7% s. 12.4%; p = 0.33). In a comparison study conducted in Brazil, the frequency of MACE was also insignificant between the two groups (6.3% vs. 6.9%; p = 0.89) 10 . None of the patients required an emergency by-pass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Therefore, depending on available facilities for early PCI, both primary and rescue PCI strategies are proving to be effective for coronary reperfusion 10 . The objective of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of the outcomes of rescue and primary PCI performed at the Cardiology Unit-5, NHSL over a period of 2 years (March 2013–April 2015).…”
In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) are similar in both rescue and primary intervention groups, supporting the former as a practical option for patients with no immediate access to PCI facilities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.