Improving treatment of depression in primary health care: a case study of obstacles to perform a clinical trial designed to implement practice guidelines

Abstract

AimThe aim of this study is to investigate factors contributing to the failure of a randomized clinical trial designed to implement and test clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of depression in primary health care (PHC).BackgroundAlthough the occurrence of depression is increasing globally, many patients with depression do not receive optimal treatment. Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of depression, which aim to establish evidence-based clinical practice in health care, are often underused and in need of operationalization in and adaptation to clinical praxis. This study explores a failed clinical trial designed to implement and test treatment of depression in PHC in Sweden.MethodQualitative case study methodology was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight participants from the clinical trial researcher group and 11 health care professionals at five PHC units. Additionally, archival data (ie, documents, email correspondence, reports on the clinical trial) from the years 2007–2010 were analysed.FindingsThe study identified barriers to the implementation of the clinical trial in the project characteristics, the medical professionals, the patients, and the social network, as well as in the organizational, economic and political context. The project increased staff workload and created tension as the PHC culture and the research activities clashed (eg, because of the systematic use of questionnaires and changes in scheduling and planning of patient visits). Furthermore, there was a perception that the PHC units’ management did not sufficiently support the project and that the project lacked basic incentives for reaching a sustainable resolution. Despite efforts by the project managers to enhance and support implementation of the innovation, they were unable to overcome these barriers. The study illustrates the complexity and barriers of performing clinical trials in the PHC.

Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher’s experiences from 20 projects

“…Single or multiple case studies using qualitative and mixed methods were common. The use of a demanding research design and the lack of a research culture on behalf of practitioners and their organisation can act as a strong barrier for research collaboration [ 56 ].…”

Improving Asthma Care in Rural Primary Care Practices: A Performance Improvement Project

“…Primary care practices are challenged daily to provide evidence‐based care to a diverse population affected by complex chronic illnesses . Asthma is a common chronic disease that is inadequately controlled in up to 75% of patients .…”

Use of a self-rating scale to monitor depression severity in recurrent GP consultations in primary care – does it really make a difference? A randomised controlled study

“…The nurse collected baseline data, gathered oral and written consent, and supported the staff at the site, functions that primary care personnel stress are important to make it easier to combine clinical work and research [26]. We were well aware of the possible obstacles to conducting a RCT at a PHCC as described by Richter and Roy-Byrne [27, 28]. …”