2020
DOI: 10.1088/2632-2153/abc81c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the segmentation of scanning probe microscope images using convolutional neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In [38], because manual segmentation of nanostructured surface images is time-consuming and requires high professionalism. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an automated method for segmenting nanoparticles based on U-Net.…”
Section: Other Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [38], because manual segmentation of nanostructured surface images is time-consuming and requires high professionalism. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an automated method for segmenting nanoparticles based on U-Net.…”
Section: Other Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, noise and other artifacts in the image can be mistaken as an object and uneven levelling makes it impossible to threshold features at a particular height. It was recently shown that the CNN U-Net, introduced above, could be used to classify different types of agglomerations of nanoparticles in AFM images [ 141 ]. U-Net was chosen because it works well on relatively small training sets (in this case 428 images, which was also a manageable size for the supervised learning applied here), and the fact that it provides precise localization, as required for segmenting such features.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While noise removal is also particularly vital, a denoising autoencoder trained on the simulated data performed extremely well at this task and may be applicable elsewhere to smooth features and remove processing artifacts. Additional improvements could be made with alternative network structures, fewer target structures, and/or a machine learning approach to binarisation, 4,38 defect segmentation, and anomaly detection. 35,36 The method we have developed for automated identification of nanostructured patterns is an effective first stage of file search, capable of isolating files and locations of interest.…”
Section: ■ Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because automating this process is not trivial, preprocessing is typically done manually . However, unlike other automated methods , which maximize aesthetic quality for a large visual variety of images, we are not interested in aesthetic quality, and only need a broadly reasonable preprocessing method. By optimizing the routine for the target structures, we can also assume that images unable to be processed are of low quality and/or not the structures being searched for and so can be discarded.…”
Section: Preprocessing and Filtering Real Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation