2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00946-5_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Segmentation of Anatomical Structures in Chest Radiographs Using U-Net with an ImageNet Pre-trained Encoder

Abstract: Accurate segmentation of anatomical structures in chest radiographs is essential for many computer-aided diagnosis tasks. In this paper we investigate the latest fully-convolutional architectures for the task of multi-class segmentation of the lungs field, heart and clavicles in a chest radiograph. In addition, we explore the influence of using different loss functions in the training process of a neural network for semantic segmentation. We evaluate all models on a common benchmark of 247 X-ray images from th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SemiTC reached 87 ± 1.5% mIOU in <20% supervision mode (10 labeled images for training and 10 for validation). Table 2 compares our baseline network and the proposed SemiTC+ with the inter-observer agreement [16] and state-of-the-art chest X-ray segmentation methods [3,8,4]. All these methods are based on fully convolutional networks and are trained in a supervised way using at least 124(123) labeled images from the JSRT dataset.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…SemiTC reached 87 ± 1.5% mIOU in <20% supervision mode (10 labeled images for training and 10 for validation). Table 2 compares our baseline network and the proposed SemiTC+ with the inter-observer agreement [16] and state-of-the-art chest X-ray segmentation methods [3,8,4]. All these methods are based on fully convolutional networks and are trained in a supervised way using at least 124(123) labeled images from the JSRT dataset.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these methods are based on fully convolutional networks and are trained in a supervised way using at least 124(123) labeled images from the JSRT dataset. For these comparisons, we post-processed all predicted segmentations as described in [4] (small objects removal, hole filling).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in line with recent studies demonstrating that when using a small dataset, transfer learning is recommended in comparison to full training, and that fine-tuned CNNs are more robust to the size of training. [29][30][31] Due to the high heterogeneity signal of OPGs and unclear borders, in this study we used fuzzy c-means clustering, also referred to as soft k-means clustering, for classification of tumor components. In non-fuzzy clustering, data are divided into hard clusters, where each data point belongs to exactly one cluster; in fuzzy clustering, the data points can belong to more than one cluster, while providing the strength of association for each one of the clusters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Islam and Zhang [5] used convolutive networks to segment in the Montgomery and Shenzhen databases. Mayan et al [6] used the architecture U-Net with an ImageNet Pre-trained encoder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%