2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64928-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the mechanical behavior of reduced graphene oxide/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites using gas injection into powders synthesis autoclave

Abstract: in this study, we show the synthesis of reduced graphene oxide/hydroxyapatite (rGo/HA) composites using a hydrothermal autoclave with argon-15% hydrogen gas injection. This both increases the hydrothermal pressure and uses hydrogen as a reductive agent in the process. The synthesized powders were then consolidated with spark plasma sintering method. The analysis of the consolidated samples included Vickers Indentation technique and cell viability. The results showed that injected gases in the autoclave produce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it should be noted that the MTT assay is one of the most common experiments in biocompatibility assays but it is not complete enough and more in vitro and in vivo assays are required to prove the biocompatibility. It can be seen ( Figure 10(b,c)) that the surface of the samples from the hydrophilic (in pure HA [52]) state was somewhat close to the hydrophobic (in HA-rGO nanocomposites) state (very similar results to this analysis have been published elsewhere with clearer images [68]). The reason for this is that GO is hydrophilic and is somewhat hydrophobic after reduction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, it should be noted that the MTT assay is one of the most common experiments in biocompatibility assays but it is not complete enough and more in vitro and in vivo assays are required to prove the biocompatibility. It can be seen ( Figure 10(b,c)) that the surface of the samples from the hydrophilic (in pure HA [52]) state was somewhat close to the hydrophobic (in HA-rGO nanocomposites) state (very similar results to this analysis have been published elsewhere with clearer images [68]). The reason for this is that GO is hydrophilic and is somewhat hydrophobic after reduction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…46 The differences in the water contact angle value after the application of the coatings can be attributed to the high hydrophilicity of HA as compared to RGO, discussed in literature. 47 Proper interaction and attachment of cells unto the surface of an implant is key to their successful clinical application. 48 As seen in the cytocompatibility results, all sam- showed they adhered in a shape of spindle with filopodia extensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plastic energy as a quantitative reflection of the viscosity effect is due to the internal friction inside the polymer/composite. 36,37 The plastic properties of ExG/ Epoxy826 nanocomposites continue to increase until the ExG concentration reaches 16 wt%. Besides, as shown in Figure 15(b), an abnormal reduction phenomenon was observed for the 16 wt% ExG/ Epoxy826 nanocomposite, which was attributed to the apparent agglomeration of EXG in the nanocomposite.…”
Section: Pdhmentioning
confidence: 99%