2019
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the classification of neuropsychiatric conditions using gene ontology terms as features

Abstract: Although neuropsychiatric disorders have an established genetic background, their molecular foundations remain elusive. This has prompted many investigators to search for explanatory biomarkers that can predict clinical outcomes. One approach uses machine learning to classify patients based on blood mRNA expression. However, these endeavors typically fail to achieve the high level of performance, stability, and generalizability required for clinical translation. Moreover, these classifiers can lack interpretab… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This overlap is consistent with a broad literature supporting common pathway-level signatures across the widely heterogeneous population of ASD probands. If true, it may be advantageous to model pathway-level dysregulation directly, for example in machine learning applications Quinn et al (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This overlap is consistent with a broad literature supporting common pathway-level signatures across the widely heterogeneous population of ASD probands. If true, it may be advantageous to model pathway-level dysregulation directly, for example in machine learning applications Quinn et al (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, we elected to use the Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Process and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) annotation databases. Pathways with less than ten associated genes were removed before estimating pathway-level expression by taking the sum of counts for all genes in each pathway, as described and validated in [23]. This results in 3942 GO features and 302 KEGG features that are then used for model training.…”
Section: Engineering Annotation-level Expression From Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, we elected to use the Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Process and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) annotation databases. Pathways with less than ten associated genes were removed before estimating pathway-level expression by taking the sum of counts for all genes in each pathway, as described and validated in Quinn et al (2018). This results in 3942 GO features and 302 KEGG features that are then used for model training.…”
Section: Engineering Annotation-level Expression From Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%