2021
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2021.3130063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Accuracy of Global DEM of Differences (DoD) in Google Earth Engine for 3-D Change Detection Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, other studies evaluated the vertical accuracy of open-source DEM, i.e., SRTM and ASTER (Yap et al (2019), Miliaresis and Paraschou (2005), Suwandana et al (2012), Mirza et al (2011), Mukherjee et al (2013), Falorni et al (2005, and Shaikh et al (2021)). To improve the accuracy of the DEM, Yamazaki et al (2017) produced a highaccurate map of global terrain elevations, Capolupo (2021) enhanced the accuracy of GDEM of differences in the Google Earth Engine for 3D change detection analysis, Muhadi, Mohd Kassim, and Abdullah (2019) Improved DEM using data fusion technique for oil palm replanting phase. In addition, Xu and Zhou (2016) suggested recovering distorted DEMs of regular terrain while Deilami et al (2012) recommended reducing pit and flat error for improving DEM accuracy.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, other studies evaluated the vertical accuracy of open-source DEM, i.e., SRTM and ASTER (Yap et al (2019), Miliaresis and Paraschou (2005), Suwandana et al (2012), Mirza et al (2011), Mukherjee et al (2013), Falorni et al (2005, and Shaikh et al (2021)). To improve the accuracy of the DEM, Yamazaki et al (2017) produced a highaccurate map of global terrain elevations, Capolupo (2021) enhanced the accuracy of GDEM of differences in the Google Earth Engine for 3D change detection analysis, Muhadi, Mohd Kassim, and Abdullah (2019) Improved DEM using data fusion technique for oil palm replanting phase. In addition, Xu and Zhou (2016) suggested recovering distorted DEMs of regular terrain while Deilami et al (2012) recommended reducing pit and flat error for improving DEM accuracy.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the direct differential operation between two digital elevation models (DEMs) of the same place acquired at different times, known as the DEM of difference (DOD), is employed to characterize the differences of multi-temporal surface morphology. DOD can significantly reduce the impact of outliers and high surface roughness, making it suitable for rapidly measuring surface morphology differences under low surface roughness and is therefore widely applied [37], [38], [39], [40]. However, in most cases, high-precision DEMs may not have been obtained prior to the occurrence of landslides because the location of landslides is usually unknown in advance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Version 4.1 of the SRTM DEM is distributed by the Consortium for Spatial Information (CGIAR-CSI) [45]. It is important to note that global DEMs are generally less accurate than local DEMs and may contain errors, the main sources of which are the post-processing or generation techniques used [46]. The area chosen for this study is largely flat, so negligible errors in altitude can be accepted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%