2001
DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.22.2871
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Improving Quality Improvement Using Achievable Benchmarks For Physician Feedback

Abstract: Use of achievable benchmarks significantly enhances the effectiveness of physician performance feedback in the setting of a multimodal quality improvement intervention.

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
412
27
24
23

Citation Types

1
144
0
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
399
51
27
2

Relationship

4
475

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 478 publications

(145 citation statements)
references

References 63 publications

1
144
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This improvement is consistent with the results of a small randomized, controlled trial of benchmarking in diabetes primary care (12). Benchmarking to improve clinical outcomes has been tested in other areas, such as myocardial infarction, hypertension, breast cancer screening, antibiotic use, and immunization.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This improvement is consistent with the results of a small randomized, controlled trial of benchmarking in diabetes primary care (12). Benchmarking to improve clinical outcomes has been tested in other areas, such as myocardial infarction, hypertension, breast cancer screening, antibiotic use, and immunization.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The solution to provide benchmark dashboards was a sensible approach for QI given that previous research has empirically shown performance improvements when primary care providers have access to such tools. 22 23 Based on our findings, we believe that access to repositories of benchmark data could be of value to promote the use of eCQMs for QI. This is provided to some degree by CMS through the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 24 ; however, we believe that there remains a need for additional regional and national benchmark resources.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 72%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Many hypotheses exist about how performance comparators may trigger more reactions to the feedback, such as using achievable benchmarks instead of medians [ 21 ]. At the moment, there is conflicting evidence about this hypothesis [ 16 , 22 ], and our results demonstrate that intensive care professionals often aim for something higher regardless of which comparator is delivered.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 73%