2017
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving protein fold recognition by extracting fold-specific features from predicted residue–residue contacts

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, it can be interpreted as the adjacency matrix of a graph, where each amino acid is a node and edges represent amino acids that are in contact with each other. In order to extract meaningful information from contact maps, both two-dimensional CNNs (Zhu et al, 2017;Zheng et al, 2019) and graph convolutional networks (GCNs) (Fout et al, 2017;Zamora-Resendiz and Crivelli, 2019) have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, it can be interpreted as the adjacency matrix of a graph, where each amino acid is a node and edges represent amino acids that are in contact with each other. In order to extract meaningful information from contact maps, both two-dimensional CNNs (Zhu et al, 2017;Zheng et al, 2019) and graph convolutional networks (GCNs) (Fout et al, 2017;Zamora-Resendiz and Crivelli, 2019) have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TBM is based upon the observation that many proteins share similar structures even if their sequences diverge ( Kinch and Grishin, 2002 ; Zhang and Skolnick, 2005 ). The quality of TBM critically depends on accurate sequence-template alignment and correct template recognition, both of which are challenging when only distantly-related templates are available for a protein sequence under prediction ( Cozzetto and Tramontano, 2004 ; Hou, et al , 2018 ; Jo, et al , 2015 ; Jones, 1997 ; Peng and Xu, 2011a ; Peng and Xu, 2011b ; Zhu, et al , 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constructing a proper feature vector from a protein sequence is a critical step for protein fragment prediction [ 7 ]. Using multiple features extraction strategy, representing sequence, evolutionary, physicochemical information of a sequence fragment, maximizes the discriminative capability of the fold recognizer [ 31 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, ensemble classifiers and kernel-based methods are introduced to discover correlations between sequence features to overcome the weakness of the early machine learning methods and improve the discriminability of the fold recognizers [ 5 ]. Recently, deep learning techniques have been applied to extract effective features, such as secondary structures [ 4 ] and inter-residue contacts [ 7 ], to further improve fold recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%