2014
DOI: 10.1186/1866-1955-6-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving IQ measurement in intellectual disabilities using true deviation from population norms

Abstract: BackgroundIntellectual disability (ID) is characterized by global cognitive deficits, yet the very IQ tests used to assess ID have limited range and precision in this population, especially for more impaired individuals.MethodsWe describe the development and validation of a method of raw z-score transformation (based on general population norms) that ameliorates floor effects and improves the precision of IQ measurement in ID using the Stanford Binet 5 (SB5) in fragile X syndrome (FXS; n = 106), the leading in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
111
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Fragile X researchers have accounted for floor effects in some common intelligence tests by developing alternative deviation scoring systems (Hessl et al, 2009; Sansone et al, 2014), though this approach has not yet been applied to pre-school testing. In the context of research studies, a predicted score might be used (Whitaker & Gordon, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Fragile X researchers have accounted for floor effects in some common intelligence tests by developing alternative deviation scoring systems (Hessl et al, 2009; Sansone et al, 2014), though this approach has not yet been applied to pre-school testing. In the context of research studies, a predicted score might be used (Whitaker & Gordon, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is important to consider factors beyond ASD when investigating the mechanisms underlying repetitive behaviours in FXS. For example, cognitive delays Sansone et al, 2014) and anxiety (Cordiero et al 2011;Talisa et al 2014) may be important risk factors for the development of at least some types of repetitive behaviours (Miguel et al 1997;Gabriels et al 2005). In the case of FXS, therefore, it is possible that high rates of repetitive behaviours covary with lower levels of cognitive functioning as well as with higher levels of anxiety and are orthogonal to the social-affective impairments at the core of an ASD diagnosis.…”
Section: Factors Relating To Repetitive Behavioursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants' cognitive functioning was assessed using the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scales-Fifth Edition (SB-5) [33]. Given that the majority of the participants obtained a full-scale IQ score at or close to the floor score (40) of the test (males: 45% with a score of 40 and 81% ≤50; females: 13% with a score of 40 and 39% ≤50), deviation scores were calculated and used in all the statistical models for verbal and nonverbal IQ using the technique proposed by Sansone and colleagues [34]. Participants' caregivers also completed the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) [35], Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) [36], Social Responsiveness Scale-Second Edition (SRS-2) [37], and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-Third Edition (Vineland-3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%